- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 -
This part will focus on geography. An assessment will also be made of the consequences of the expected pole change in our version based on the traces on the Earth's surface from past pole changes.
The works of M. G. Groswald, especially his book "Eurasian hydrospheric disasters and glaciation of the Arctic", published in 1999, describe in great detail both the scale and consequences of inertial flows in Eurasia.
For the most part, the article will rely on data from Groswald's research, as the most reliable and detailed. After all, the research was carried out by the Russian Academy of Sciences.
In the article, we will often and a lot cite the book and give our comments to the quotes.
Let's start with the introduction:
So, according to the results of field studies by professional glaciologists, traces of transcontinental catastrophic streams were found, crossing all of Eurasia. They begin in the area of the coast of the Taimyr Peninsula and go across the entire Eurasian continent to the south - southeast to the Caspian Sea and further at least to the border of France and Spain.
The traces of these streams unambiguously prove their abnormally high speed and inertia. Inertia will be discussed in more detail below.
And now let's look at the traces, or rather, at the places of these traces and see if the studies of Russian academicians as well as foreign glaciologists confirm or deny our version of the periodic changes of the poles.
Here is a drawing from M. G. Groswald "Eurasian hydrospheric disasters and Arctic glaciation", which shows two inertial flows. In the book they are called "Trans-Siberian system of melt runoff" (p. 24) and "Gobi-Amur runoff system" (p. 25).
The following figure shows the lines and directions along which the pole moved the last (blue) and the last (turquoise) times.
In Groswald's book on page 62 there is a drawing showing where the inertial flow was at its maximum intensity.
It is called the "Consolidated Map of the Location of Ridge-Hollow Complexes of Northern Eurasia." If we draw on this map the equator of the past movement of the pole (this is the line through the past and present pole, along which the movement of land relative to the water was the most intense), then we get the following picture:
As can be seen from the figure, both the direction and the place where, according to the results of MG Groswald's research, there are traces of inertial catastrophic flows with maximum intensity exactly coincides with the equator of the past displacement of the poles.
An attentive reader will say, looking at the picture: “So the flow turns in an arc, and the pole, within the framework of your version, travels strictly in a straight line. Inconsistency).
The question is correct, because indeed, why on earth did the inertial flow turn from north to west?
Let's do a thought experiment:
Where will the water go if land moves north relative to the water, as it supposedly did during the last pole shift?
At first, of course, the water will go strictly to the south, but then due to the fact that the land will increase its speed due to the rotation of the Earth when moving to lower latitudes (closer to the equator), water, which was originally in high latitudes (closer to the pole) and rotated slowly, falling on land, which, when moving closer to the equator, increases its speed due to the faster rotation of the Earth in low latitudes in comparison with high latitudes, will "flow" first to the northwest, and then to the west. Which fully corresponds to the picture observed by the researchers of the RAS.
In our version, the Transsiberian runoff system corresponds to the past pole movement and is the youngest of all. Groswald confirms that this is so.
Here is a quote from the book, page 75:
All this concerns the Trans-Siberian runoff system. And what about the Gobi-Amur?
According to Groswald, the traces of the Gobi-Amur runoff system have been preserved much worse than the traces of the Trans-Siberian system.
Quoting from page 22:
Within the framework of our version, everything is correct: the Gobi-Amur runoff system is nothing more than a trace from the inertial flow of the two last pole movements.
As you can see in the picture, the point of intersection of the equator of the move before last (turquoise line) with the coastline in Iran exactly corresponds to the beginning of the Gobi-Amur runoff system. Within the framework of our version, everything should be so: when the land moved to the south, when the pole moved from Greenland to the territory of the current United States the year before last, the water should have flowed first to the north and then to the northeast. After all, water fell on land, which rotated more slowly, since it was closer to the pole. Accordingly, when the land moved to the south, it began to overtake it and flow eastward - in the direction of the Earth's rotation.
If we look at the place where the equator of the move before last intersects with the coast - on the territory of present-day Iran, we will see the following picture:
As if that sand pile had been poured out in a row by several buckets of water. That, as a model, is very similar in essence to the splash of an inertial flow from the Indian Ocean onto land.
The picture mirrors the northern splash on Taimyr, the only difference is in the direction of the flow - not from north to south, but from south to north and not from east to west, but from west to east.
Within the framework of our version, everything should be exactly the same - after all, the movement before last was in the opposite direction - from south to north, and the past - from north to south.
Therefore, we observe two mirror runoff systems: Trans-Siberian and Gobi-Amur.
The younger Trans-Siberian is much better preserved than the older Gobi-Amur. Everything is beautiful and logical.
Groswald does not mention the source of the Gobi-Amur runoff system. After all, the glaciers of a kilometer height in the present northern tropic, in front of which dammed lakes could form in the mountains of Tibet, are completely absent. Therefore, he simply misses the question of how the Gobi-Amur runoff system arose. So is the question of why they mirror each other. Within the framework of the version about periodic changes of the pole, these two questions are clarified immediately and without involving unnecessary entities.
And now a quote from Groswald about the properties of flows that formed the Trans-Siberian runoff system.
In our opinion, this description does not leave any other options for the sources of flows, except for the fast (within hours) movement of the pole. By the way, thermokarst, which has now intensified (holes in Taimyr are hundreds of meters), suggests that the pole movement was recent and global warming is associated not with human activities, but with the gradual warming of the ocean after it flopped into it and melted in the 15th century (well, or simply melted, the Grand Canyon is a witness to this), an ice cap from North America, having cooled the world's oceans by a dozen degrees in a dozen other years.
In order for the water to ignore the terrain in its movement, it needs a constant source of energy. Any initial impulse received by the water does not provide a stable movement of water up the slope for hundreds of meters, and besides, it is still repeated over and over again. The difference in the speed of rotation of the Earth when the pole changes and / or the very movement of the pole imparts an impulse to the water throughout the entire length of the flow, and the movement of water stops only when the velocities of land and water are equalized and when the movement of the pole ends.
The distance that the inertial flow moves, within our version, should correspond to the distance that the pole moves.
The Trans-Siberian runoff system stretches from the Taimyr Peninsula to the Greek coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
The distance from the present pole to the coast of Greece is 5500-6000 kilometers. The distance between the present pole and the past pole in Nebraska is 5500 kilometers. Again, we observe an exact correspondence of the picture observed on the Earth's surface with what should be within the framework of our version of periodic pole changes. After all, the source of energy for the movement of huge masses of water in our version is the movement of the planet's surface when the pole changes and / or the stored energy of the movement of water due to the rotation of the Earth BEFORE the pole moves. Therefore, the distance that the inertial flow moves over land should be equal to the distance that the pole moves.
A remarkable object that confirms the reality of the recent change of pole from the territory of the current United States is the pyramid at the Le Pertus Pass.
It is oriented towards the past pole and is filled exactly from the "correct" side - from the east.
It was from that direction that an inertial flow went to Europe, which created the Trans-Siberian system of ridges and hollows or the Trans-Siberian runoff system.
As you can see in the picture from Groswald's book, the stream that formed the Trans-Siberian runoff system went through Europe from the east.
The distance from the pyramid to the present pole is 5300 kilometers. The inertial flow that passed the pyramid on the Le Pertus pass was practically at the maximum possible distance of entry to the mainland - 5500 km. After all, if we proceed from the fact that the distance of the inertial tidal wave splash to land is determined only by the distance the pole moves, then at the end of the path the mudflow masses of the tidal inertial wave will move relative to the Earth's surface only due to the difference in the rotation speed of the Earth's surface in higher latitudes, where the water was before the shift and the rate of rotation of the Earth's surface at low latitudes where the water was after the shift. That is, at the “end” or at the maximum run-in distance, the mudflow within our version should move along the new latitude in the direction opposite to the Earth's rotation,because the surface of the Earth is moving, but the mudflow is standing. This is exactly what we see on the pyramid at the Le Pertus Pass.
The picture is exactly the same in the Volga delta.
Quote from Groswald "Eurasian Hydrospheric Disasters and Arctic Glaciation", page 39:
The distance from the present pole to the Volga delta is 4950 km. The range is close to the limiting one (5500 km), but not equal to it, respectively, the vertical component of the velocity is not yet equal to zero, the flow must still shift further to the south, which we observe in the space image: the flow moves along a gentle arc to the west, slightly shifting by south.
Again, we observe the coincidence of the observed on the surface with the expected within the framework of our version of the pole changes.
The pyramid at the Le Pertus Pass looks very well preserved; it is clearly not 12,000 years old. The dating of the drift is more likely hundreds of years, not even thousands. The fact that the movement of the poles is a recurring phenomenon on Earth is also confirmed by the results of Groswald's research.
Here is a quote from the book, page 75:
That is, Eurasia has experienced at least 10 pole shifts, which is also perfectly consistent with our version of periodically repeating pole changes. In our version, this is how it should be.