Spin electromagnetic field radio communication
Since the end of the last (XX) century, radio amateurs in many countries began to operate "very strange" antennas. These antennas are known as CFA, A, or EH. EH is a vivid representative of these "strange" antennas among radio amateurs. It is quite difficult to find another device that could cause such a huge amount of misunderstanding and contradiction in history. A huge camp of opinions says that the EH-ANTENNA is a very bad antenna. It performs worse than a shortened dipole or a shortened pin. The small opinion camp says the EH antenna is a very good antenna. It has very small dimensions that do not match the wave sizes, and yet it works quite well. The EH can provide radio communications where conventional antennas cannot. Both opinion camps cannot understand the fact that something about the EH antenna is so NEW,which is not known to modern science.
Any conventional antenna operates on the dynamics of the FORWARD movement of electric charges in the elements of its structure. Now there are already many research, experimental and scientific-theoretical works about EH antennas, which clearly show that for all the usual characteristics, this antenna is really worse than shortened rods or dipoles. It is wonderful. This is what had to be proved. This shows that the PERMANENT dynamics of electric charges in the EH antenna is very poor. In addition, the researchers of the EH antenna do not understand that the translational dynamics of electric charges in the EH antenna is generally PARASITIC. The EH antenna can only work with conventional antennas because it has this little PARASIT component.
The design of the EH antenna is made in such a way that the electric charges in its cylinder have a dominant ROTARY (spin) motion. This is the FUNDAMENTAL difference between the EH-ANTENNA and all conventional antennas. So, conventional antennas work on the PASSIVE movement of electric charges, and the EH antenna works on the ROTARY (spin) movement of electric charges. On a radio link, the EH antenna performs much better with an EH antenna than with a conventional antenna.
Any electric charge (electron) always has two components in dynamics - translational and rotational. The magnetic induction vector of a dynamic electric charge is COMPLEX, that is, it consists of two orthogonal vectors with different properties. In modern textbooks, the vector of magnetic induction of a dynamic electric charge until now is represented by a single (single) translational one. The EH antenna has activated the unknown second component of the COMPLEX vector of magnetic induction of electric charges (electrons). The dynamics of the electromagnetic field of electric charges (electrons) from each component (translational and rotational) has completely different properties in space. Readers with a high level of knowledge in the field of radiophysics and electrophysics can view the theory and understandthat the unknown vector Hz of an electric charge (electron) with unusual properties and brought the EH antenna to an absolute unknown path in science. This is an UNKNOWN RADIO COMMUNICATION ON A SPIN ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD in space.
I have been observing a huge obstruction in the "understanding" of the EH antenna for a long time. Until recently, the author Ted Hart himself did not really understand what happened, what happened. And most importantly, he himself did not understand why the classical theory of antenna devices (at least according to Eisenberg) does not "stick" to it and WILL NOT stick to it. Flies off like a hat from a dandelion in the wind. The thing happened FUNDAMENTAL.
Fig. 1 EH antenna (20 meters) at T. Hart on his horticultural farm.
In any, the first ordinary antenna that comes across, the electric charges in the antenna elements have a dominant PERMANENT periodic movement with the receipt of the corresponding vortex components of the email. and the magician. fields.
Promotional video:
In the EH antenna, the entire effect is created by electrical charges in the middle cylinder. The Coulomb plane passes through the middle cylinder. This is the plane where the antiphase magnetic fluxes of antiphase coils "collide with their heads". In this plane, electric charges cannot have a dominant translational motion. They start DANCING TWIST on the spot with the frequency of the transmitter. It can be said in another way - they make "tick-tock", like the pendulum of a mechanical clock.
Fig 2. Placement of antiphase coils.
What happens if the electron spins in place? Will there be something magnetic in this case? Yes, there will be - Bohr's magneton or in another way the spin moment. You know very well how big the difference is between the spin moment (Bohr magneton) and the moment of translational motion. This is "Fedot, but not the one." Calculating and tuning antiphase coils is very problematic. If two identical antiphase coils of the VLF range are very close to each other, then the total inductance will tend to 0 and the resonance can be caught in the centimeter range. In practice, the very output-lobe of such a VLF coil is already a necessary inductance in the centimeter range.
Fig 3. In the Coulomb square, electrons start spinning in place.
Highlights in the figures.
Fig 4. Coil connection diagram.
They are in English as they are from my large gallery of materials for Ted Hart. For almost a year I "cleared his brains" for him.
Fig 5. Main conclusions from Maxwell's equations.
He "does not pull" Maxwell's equations, he had to act with pictures. Ted Hart even had a fight with his university theorist, Robert Bibhas, that he could not explain to him what happened in several years, and the Russian did it in a few months. Ted Hart just spoke successfully at the 2004 NAB International Radio and Broadcasting Conference in Las Vegas. I was reading to Ted Hart for 9 months almost every day every other day what he had invented and could not figure out what had happened. With a "hot iron" he burned into his brain the classical antenna theory, which does not work in EH and will not work. Have you connected two magnets with the same poles (repulsion)? There is a plane between the magnets, where it is "not clear" which is more dominant, one or the other magnet. Now the same "trick" with the variable magician. field from antiphase coils. What will the email do charge (electron) in this plane. Two Lorentz forces push it in different (opposite) directions. He has no choice but to spin in place like a top in one direction or the other. This gives rise to a spin magnetic moment with completely different el. magician. properties
Mathematics is quite problematic. There are 11 pages of it in its pure form. Five leading professors of the St. Petersburg Polytechnic stumbled over her. Even at the very setting of the problem. For them, an electron is an elementary particle and it is almost impossible to apply Maxwell's equations to it. I considered the electron as the simplest element of an electric current with an electric mag. field around it. In this approach to the electron, a better apparatus than Maxwell's equations for describing dynamic processes cannot be found. Those who are especially interested in what the structure of e-mail is. fields of a dynamic electron (electric charge), can see it completely. The spin vector H z ignores the speed of light. This is INSTANT radio communication. Length H z (spin) el.mag. waves equal to INFINITY at any frequency. The concept of "wavelength" in this case turns into a complete absurdity. Hence follows the complete absurdity in understanding the "wave dimensions of the antenna." This is shown by theory (mathematics).
You will also be “tempted” to the situation of understanding - an introductory lecture in the morning, and a diploma in the evening. This option does not work, but how we would like it! This is a fundamentally NEW KIND of RADIO COMMUNICATION on the SPIN e-mail. field, not on a vortex. Hence all the confusion within the huge army of radio amateurs from all countries. "Brain cleaning" must be done methodically and for a rather long time, otherwise the situation will only worsen with EH and other developed "antennas" for a spin, not a vortex electric mag. fields.
You can look at the antennaless transmitter (energy like a receiver's local oscillator or a concert radio microphone). This copper pill operates at 100mhz. The "crown" and the microphone could also be hidden in a brass sealed blank tablet. The effect is as if it has a customized 75 cm long pin, but it does NOT. With focus receiver. With the pin extended, it receives poor or no signal at all. If the pin is removed (pushed in), then the signal appears. The input circuit (input QC) of the receiver should also be with antiphase coils in a tablet screen.
Figure: 6. An example of building a 100 MHz antenna.
The best and most convenient option in manufacturing and customization was offered by Nikolay Kisel UA3AIC. Two antiphase coils and two tuning capacitors are connected by a bridge. Radio amateurs know how to set up a bridge. The figure shows how to reduce the UA3AIC EH antenna bridge to a copper pellet. The signal penetration is higher than from a conventional antenna. Any EH-nickname already knows this well. The largest practical developments in the high penetrating ability of a radio signal on a spin electronic mag. field from the EH-antenna at Nikolay Kisel UA 3 AIC and his closest friends-radio amateurs. The opportunity opens up to carry out radio communication from the surface of the Earth into a cave or mine, as well as under water.
Figure: 7 Recommendations for EH antennas.
As you can see, everything is "very simple" at first glance.
See the pictures and remember that you are dealing with a SPIN (charge rotation) el.mag. a field that, like an awl, drills-pierces the space and not with the usual magician. moment from the forward motion of the charge. Spin email mag. the field of modern physics in practice still DOESN'T KNOW. The EH antenna was the first in practice to invade this "forbidden" spin region. In the textbooks with answers to the questions how to use the spin email. the field is very "dull". We have a “blank spot” in science and radio amateurs have stumbled upon this “blank spot”. Scientific, research, experimental work on the study and use of radio communication on the spin electronic mag. there is enough field for everyone. Much will remain for the next generations.
Experiment July 17, 2005
An experiment on underwater radio communication using HZ antennas was carried out on a lake 5-6 meters deep.
Impressive results. A homemade "dead" transmitter (KT315 - ZG, KT315 - a buffer amplifier loaded on an HZ antenna and a multivibrator buzzer, like a modulator on two KT315, powered by a Krona battery). The transmitter is tuned to a frequency of 100 MHz. Homemade VHF receiver from the MasterKit NK116 radio set with an HZ antenna. For additional control, there was also a second portable highly professional, highly sensitive receiver "Kenwood TH-F6", which the special services are armed with to search for "bugs" in offices and for other purposes. This transmitter was sunk from a boat in a sealed glass jar. The signal was received by receivers in the boat. The "miracle" was discovered immediately. When the transmitter was at a depth of 1.5 meters, the Kenwood TH-F6 receiver stopped receiving the signal, and the transmitter is still far from the bottom. A homemade VHF receiver steadily receives a buzzer signal (beeps). Have reached the bottom. VHF homemade receiver receives the signal, and the Kenwood TH-F6 receiver is silent (hisses). A few minutes later, the homemade receiver had to be adjusted. It's cold at the bottom of the lake, and the transmitter is parametric stabilized. There was little frequency drift.
6 meters of water for a "dead man" transmitter on VHF is very serious. This is what opponents will never see on the site. What does a home-made product with an HZ antenna accept that a professional "Kenwood" does not see? Where to "stick-attach" the AFU Theory for this case? This is a completely different road in radio communication.
Vladimir Korobeinikov
