What is our real legal status? By what documents and when do we become human? Are human rights and freedoms available to us in accordance with the Constitution and international law? What are human rights inalienable and belonging to everyone from birth? The correct answers to these questions are hidden from us, despite our high legal awareness. These answers are simple and disappointing, the system does not consider you a human and its rights do not apply to you and your children, you are only concerned with the duties and preferences of a citizen of the Russian Federation who is in a subordinate, in fact, slave status in comparison with the legal status of a HUMAN.
We were told that we are HUMANITIES and many still remember the times of the USSR with the high status of a "Soviet MAN", which was promoted at all levels and hammered into the head. And therefore, when we read the Constitution and all kinds of UN declarations, we have no doubt that all this concerns us in the status of human beings. However, upon closer examination, all these legal constructs fall apart like houses of cards. In fact, we do not know the differences between a person and a citizen, we do not know our human rights, given to us at birth, in no official document we are not called human beings or even people. And most importantly, not a single official document or law describes the procedure for the appearance of a new person (and not a citizen).
Let's study together our Constitution, international Declaration of Human Rights, as well as key laws of the Russian Federation in order to understand our real legal status. In fact, only the Constitution speaks of a person and human rights; in all the other thousands of laws and bylaws of the Russian Federation, we are called by any other words, but not human beings or human beings. We are citizens, individuals, individuals and a wide variety of adjectives, such as patients, students, military personnel, attesting witnesses, persons under investigation, newborns, deceased, etc. etc. According to the idea, all these adjectives should refer to some kind of noun, and we naively believe that this noun has a human root.
Not a single lawyer will explain to you in such a way that you understand the difference between a person and a citizen, because he himself does not know this. But this is the basis of the foundations of the entire legal structure, as evidenced by the first articles of the basic law:
Article 2
Man, his rights and freedoms are the highest value. Recognition, observance and protection of human and civil rights and freedoms is the duty of the state.
Article 17
1. In the Russian Federation, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen are recognized and guaranteed in accordance with the generally recognized principles and norms of international law and in accordance with this Constitution.
Promotional video:
2. Basic human rights and freedoms are inalienable and belong to everyone from birth.
3. The exercise of human and civil rights and freedoms should not violate the rights and freedoms of others.
Article 6.
1. Citizenship of the Russian Federation is acquired and terminated in accordance with federal law, is uniform and equal, regardless of the grounds for acquisition.
2. Every citizen of the Russian Federation has on its territory all the rights and freedoms and bears equal obligations stipulated by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
3. A citizen of the Russian Federation may not be deprived of his citizenship or the right to change it.
The 17th article says that human rights and freedoms belong to him from birth. We open further the normative documents regulating the birth in the Russian Federation. This is the instruction of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the State Statistics Committee of the Russian Federation of December 4, 1992 N 318/190 on the definition of criteria for live birth, stillbirth, perinatal period. I will give just one quote from this wonderful document, which determines the date and time of birth on the territory of Russia. "Each product of such (meaning successful) birth is considered as a live birth." Our babies are interpreted by the system as “products of birth” and are categorized as live or stillborn. And before that, from the moment of conception, they were considered a fetus, that is, they had no rights at all. The instructions of the USSR Ministry of Health in this regard are not very different and also manipulates the words of the fetus, newborn, premature, etc. In one place it says about the "birth of a child", but also not about a person.
Thus, the legal status of all those born in Russia is a live birth product. This is quite different from a HUMAN who sounds proud. The words “product of birth” are not very applicable even to cattle, since the tiger cub, the fox cub, and the bear cub are living creatures. Apparently, our real status is close to the animal level or even lower.
Parents of "products of birth" receive a birth certificate, where everyone already appears as citizens. Similarly, earlier, when born into slavery, the child automatically received the jurisdiction of the slave owner. Citizenship cannot be renounced, it can only be changed by changing its owner, since any “product of birth” must have an owner who, unlike us, has free will.
Does a citizen become a human being within the framework of any legal relationship? In labor law, a participant in a legal relationship is an individual, apparently, something two-legged and acting only in the physical plane. In the civil code, an equal sign is made between a citizen and an individual. Only a sane natural person who has reached the age established by the Criminal Code is subject to criminal liability, that is, if a person is something more than an individual, then criminal liability in the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation does not apply to him. The Administrative Code also only works with “persons”. At the same time, the formulations “official” and “person on duty” indirectly indicate that even people in power, shoulder straps and weapons are not formally human. Their status is equal to ours:live birth product = natural person = citizen.
Maybe a citizen is not a bad thing? How does he actually differ from a person? And what are these inalienable rights, that is, rights that do not at all depend on the state where you were born? In which of our rights no state has the right to interfere if we have the status of people?
Our constitution recognizes the priority of the norms of international law, about which we know nothing at all. If in some bull of the Pope from 1500 it is written that we are all his herd, do not have free will and belong to him with all the guts of our movable and immovable property, then this may well have the status of the highest international act, from which all others are repelled legal constructions in the world. They just told us nothing about it, but ignorance of the laws does not exempt from anything …
At the same time, all world integration systems, be it the UN, the European Union, APEC, NATO, are interstate systems, not universal ones. Even such a global body as the United Nations unites states. This follows from the UN Charter. And the nations remained as if nothing to do with. It is not the peoples who have a voice, but the representatives of governments, that is, state institutions acting on behalf of citizens without human status.
Civil society, represented by non-governmental organizations, is essentially voiceless and the fate of the world can only discuss, but not decide. Humanity actually remains unjust. Indeed: Man has rights and freedoms (for some reason without obligations), but Mankind does not. Obviously, Humanity should have a part of the legal norms similar to the norms of the Universal Declaration, both in scope and in meaning. In fact, the legal personality of Mankind is either not defined or is not known to us (which is more likely), since we are not human, and we are part of humanity only on a par with other domestic animals.
According to the norms of international law hidden from us, a person is the one who made the appropriate declaration of will, accepted by one of three bodies: the Queen of England, the Pope and the UN. All the remaining 7 billion people have almost no legal human status and remain legally “products of birth” and objects of law. Sergey Danilov speaks about this in his story about the legal nature of man and local self-government.
What inalienable birth rights does a person have? All of them do not depend on the state system; these are non-economic, non-social, uncivilized, non-ecological rights. They arise when a person possesses not only a physical body (physical person), but also a spirit and soul, that is, a bearer of a particle of the highest principle in himself. The denial of the spiritual and mental component automatically turns a person into a slave, into a two-legged product of birth, and all human rights are a projection of God's spark, a projection of the image and likeness of the higher principle inherent in a person onto the surrounding reality.
When a hundred years ago, the rebellious workers and peasants shouted "We are not slaves - we are not slaves", but at the same time denied the presence of a higher principle and soul in themselves, they only changed one form of slavery to another, not having a single chance to get freedom.
Freedom of conscience and religion is a person's right to their own worldview, regardless of the current laws, party and government policies.
The right to receive information is actually the prohibition of lying to a person in any form, lying to a person is the same as misleading the whole universe and lying to God, it is pointless and very punishable.
The fact that I have human rights in the complex endows me with honor and dignity, which cannot be possessed by a citizen (individual), impaired, “fenced off”, “fenced off”, that is, being “in the fence”, in the limitations of his capabilities.
According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “every person, wherever he is, has the right to recognition of his legal personality”. This means that he acts directly, without any documents by the mere fact of his existence and presence. Compare this with the miserable presence of citizens in the courts of the Russian Federation with a bunch of documents of identification.
By and large, a person does not need documents, and the procedure for verifying an identity belittles human dignity and is not applicable to him, it only applies to two-legged slaves of citizens. How this legal system works can be roughly judged by the holders of diplomatic passports and immunity. They, like people, are not subject to the jurisdiction of national courts, they are inviolable to national law enforcement agencies. Cars with diplomatic numbers are not visible to the traffic police.
You will probably be very surprised, but the Russian courts are not competent to judge people in either civil or criminal proceedings. They can only judge citizens or individuals, that is, slaves. In this regard, everyone who presents his document at the entrance to the public place only certifies his status as a "product of birth", and not a person. At all times, it was enough for a person to introduce himself, and to present some pieces of paper was beneath human dignity, I think that something similar works now in the human world, about which we know little.
Here we find an explanation for some of the legal collisions around high-ranking officials who were stealing. If Serdyukov and Vasilyeva received documents of people, then the criminal system of the Russian Federation against them is powerless, they are not under its jurisdiction, and from the point of view of the international court, they did not violate anything by stealing from the Russian Federation and its citizens, since the latter are not people and have no legal personality. Legally, only the sovereign (master) of the Russian Federation can ask them what periodically happens when we learn that our former ministers were imprisoned or killed in the vicinity of London or New York. For thieves at this moment an unexpected insight comes, they all their lives thought that they were robbing the Russian people, but it turned out that this slave tribe had nothing of its own for a long time,and everything Russian really belongs to an evil and specific guy overseas or in a Winsor castle, who can multiply or divide anyone by zero.
The same Universal Declaration says - "everyone has the right to citizenship." Now look at yourself from the outside: first you ended up in the Soviet Union without any rights to refuse or even change your citizenship, then you were transferred to Russian citizenship without your desire and even knowingly. Your children automatically become natural persons of the Russian Federation, and you cannot, in principle, renounce citizenship, you can only change it. To consider yourself a person after that is, legally, at least naive. To have the right to citizenship means choosing a suitable jurisdiction for yourself or giving it up without losing anything, except for the preferences provided by specific states to their citizens, such as social security or a pension.
Moreover, “everyone has the right to move freely and choose their place of residence within each state” and “everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and return to his country”. Translated into Russian, a person can live anywhere regardless of citizenship. If you were a human being, you could end your citizenship in the Russian Federation with one paper and continue to live outside the tax regime and without the threat of deportation, since deportation to a MAN is not applicable at all, it can only happen by a decision of an international court competent to judge people.
Everyone has the right to repose after death. This innate right protects the body of the deceased from any manipulation, it must be buried forever in accordance with the traditions and beliefs of the deceased. In our country, both in Russia and in Europe, most of the corpses are defiled by autopsy. We are denied by the system in the presence of spirit and soul, and therefore they do whatever they want with human remains. The body of the deceased has been turned into evidence that can be dismembered, analyzed, exhumed several times. At the same time, the spirit, soul and body are interconnected, this connection is not destroyed at the time of death, but only after cremation or complete biological decomposition of the flesh. Our ancestors, as well as warriors of all times and peoples, therefore defended the bodies of the fallen, because the enemies could outrage not only the corpses, but also the souls that had not yet severed their connection with this world. Now the system is abusing by the hands of pathologists over almost all the bodies of dead people, except for the obviously senile and medical diagnoses.
For example, in the new draft law “On Burial and Funeral Business,” a funeral is not a send-off of a person to another world, but a farewell to the remains of an individual. And if this person has not yet been identified, then he even loses the right to a grave, he can be exhumed after 5 years, burned and scattered in the wind.
In fact, you can take almost any law and see its inconsistency with the proper implementation of human rights in this area. And it's not that the laws are bad. The system prints them in incredible quantities, and the people's representatives vote for them without looking, for clear and understandable purposes that run counter to the interests of the people. Our slave status was hidden from us, and even lawyers and judges do not understand it. In this regard, I recommend that everyone, in the framework of any legal proceedings, appeal not to the Constitution, but to international human rights standards. Of course, we are not formally people - but the judges do not know this.
Let us dwell on property rights and labor legislation as the broadest and most affecting all:
Article 9.
1. Land and other natural resources are used and protected in the Russian Federation as the basis for the life and activities of the peoples living in the corresponding territory.
2. Land and other natural resources may be in private, state, municipal and other forms of ownership.
From these articles it becomes clear that the land and subsoil do NOT belong to the people of Russia. They can be owned and are there, but the owners are not us. It is likely that citizens cannot be owners at all, but only humans. In this regard, the issuance of certificates of ownership in RosReestr was probably stopped for us. Most likely, we are something like nominal owners. In ancient Rome, even a slave could nominally have property and commercial affairs, but the slave owner was the beneficiary and sovereign of everything.
We do not know much about the sovereign, he hides under the "norms of international law":
Article 15.
2. Bodies of state power, bodies of local self-government, officials, citizens and their associations are obliged to comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and laws.
4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty are applied.
There are two main categories in a society built by Roman law:
- Patricians with full birth rights
- Plebeians, whose rights are limited and described in special laws. The expression of the opinion of the plebeians (that is, conditionally free) takes place in a referendum (plebiscite). In our constitution, a person is a patrician, and a citizen is a plebeian.
Article 37. of the Constitution emphasizes the slavish nature of any of our labor, since we do not have its results, but only receive the right to remuneration not lower than some minimum wage. Forced labor is prohibited, and we can choose the application of forces ourselves, but the results of labor in any case do not belong to us.
Article 37.
1. Labor is free. Everyone has the right to freely dispose of their abilities for work, to choose their type of activity and profession.
2. Forced labor is prohibited.
3. Everyone has the right to work in conditions that meet the requirements of safety and hygiene, to remuneration for work without any discrimination and not lower than the minimum wage established by federal law, as well as the right to protection from unemployment.
I am not a lawyer and I am not familiar with the deep interpretation of legal norms, I read and understand them literally. The only place in the regulatory documents that I found and where a person appears is a medical examination of the fact of a person's death. At the same time, a death certificate has already been issued to a citizen, and all funeral legislation, which includes the dead, perished and perished in the defense of the fatherland, no longer concerns people. From this I draw the following conclusions:
1. There are legal people in our country, and they also die.
2. The fact of death of a person and its circumstances are of great importance, and therefore local jurisdictions are empowered to establish this fact in the person of their medical authorities.
3. Since local authorized bodies cannot distinguish a person from a non-person, and there is no biological difference, the same instructions for medical examination apply to citizens and other persons as for humans.
4. After a medical examination, citizens go to the morgue, where they are gutted, and then they receive a death certificate.
5. The post-death procedure of the Russian Federation does not apply to humans, but I do not yet know what procedure is in effect.
The heart, of course, refuses to believe in much of what I have written, but the pocket willingly responds to everything and confirms our illicit position in the economic sphere.
If we are slaves, then we can mislead us with impunity through the media, poison us with drugs, vaccinations and GMO products, drink alcohol, fool us with the education system, chip, tell how spaceships plow the vastness of the universe and replace knowledge with pseudosciences, deprive property and the results of labor through thieves tax system, eviscerate after death, select children, imprisonment for an administrative fine, take away our history and memory of ancestors, prohibit any word and even thought against the slave system, use and edit our personal data, that is, mental images and memory, sprinkle with planes with toxic substances and chemtrails under the tales of climate change.
Well, if we are human - why do we allow all this? Where is our honor and dignity?
Author: Poluichik Igor