Yazylykaya And Yapildak - Alternative View

Yazylykaya And Yapildak - Alternative View
Yazylykaya And Yapildak - Alternative View

Video: Yazylykaya And Yapildak - Alternative View

Video: Yazylykaya And Yapildak - Alternative View
Video: YAPILDAK 2024, May
Anonim
Fig. 1. Facade of the building
Fig. 1. Facade of the building

Fig. 1. Facade of the building.

Yazilikaya (tur. Yazilikaya - painted rock) is a Phrygian sanctuary in the rocks in Central Anatolia in Turkey. In ancient times, a Phrygian city was located here. Currently, the ancient city is completely hidden underground. Of all the cultural heritage of the Hittites, the intra-rock temples and tombs in Yazilikaya and Yapildak are especially well preserved. Perhaps the Hittites believed that the souls of the dead people left the tombs and turned into birds, so the tombs of the Hittites were often located on the rocky slopes of the mountains? Several dozen tombs carved into the rocks have been discovered in Anatolia.

The tombs are well preserved, since the rock structures were of no value for construction (they could not be disassembled for building materials). Temples and tombs were plundered, but remained intact, therefore we have this unique opportunity to contemplate the sanctuaries of bygone eras as the Phrygians saw them. Those who saw the structures of Yazylykaya felt the sensation of touching eternity, looking at him from the surrounding rocks. The rock temples and structures of Yazylykaya are the frozen imprints of history itself. Hittite sanctuaries and tombs remind us that our world is not only the reality of the present time, but also the universe of the past, the space of the future. Man was created for eternity, not for a short, elusive moment.

You can stand here for hours, feeling her presence (see ill. 1-12) …

Fig. 2. Facade of the building
Fig. 2. Facade of the building

Fig. 2. Facade of the building

Fig. 3. The image looks like an icon. The Phrygians were Christians?
Fig. 3. The image looks like an icon. The Phrygians were Christians?

Fig. 3. The image looks like an icon. The Phrygians were Christians?

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. five
Fig. five

Fig. five.

Promotional video:

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9. Inscription on the facade
Fig. 9. Inscription on the facade

Fig. 9. Inscription on the facade.

Fig. ten
Fig. ten

Fig. ten.

Fig. 11a
Fig. 11a

Fig. 11a. The Phrygian alphabet is similar to Etruscan, a little like Phoenician (Russian H - Phoenician K):

Image
Image

Transliteration (see Fig. 9 - 11, read from left to right). Are you dying? Trinity mazhyatsemoshi, do you want to?

Transfer. Are you waiting for what you want? Triple power, do you want bliss?

I. Friedrich summed up the work of scientists who tried to decipher the Phrygian writing in his main work: “Scientists have not yet managed to convincingly and unequivocally interpret the Phrygian inscriptions. O. Haas is wary of one-sidedly following Greek analogies, but the word division and etymologization he offers are also quite arbitrary, and in most cases he does not provide evidence of his interpretation. Thus, diounsin Haas, without any proof, translates “living” (v. N.) And elevates to Indo-European * gui-iont-si-n, interpreting at the same time augoi as “living” and raising this word to * āiugoi (to others. -ind. āyu- "life"); argousi is regarded as borrowed from gr. árchousi "(at) the archons", and isgeiket as borrowed by gr. eischēke “he received”, and this is not justified in any way. The examples given are enough to make sure thatthat the interpretation of Phrygian did not go beyond the first attempts, therefore non-specialists should not particularly trust her."

The writing is not completely deciphered, since there are few inscriptions, but we can confidently conclude: the Phrygians and Hittites were PROSLAVS.

Fig. 11b
Fig. 11b

Fig. 11b.

Transliteration (see ill. 11b, top inscription, read from right to left). Nelenemtsezha hyzhahamscha turn. Transfer. Vigilant predator turn.

Transliteration (see ill. 11b, middle inscription, read. From left to right). … Eg mozzizh, burned lacquer. Transfer. Wetting them, you feel lightness (in work).

Transliteration (see illustration, lower caption, read from right to left).… To cut… Translation. To cut.

Fig. 12
Fig. 12

Fig. 12.

Huge masses of limestone and sand were not yet solidified, so with shovels it was possible to dig various dwellings and premises in them, it was possible to create whole "cave cities". This building material is not at all millions of years old, but only hundreds from the moment these lime-sand masses, together with silt, remained on the earth's surface after some kind of cataclysm - for example, a local flood. The earth's crust is very mobile. She is much more mobile than we think.

… It was a lime solution, the masses of which had gathered in certain places as a result of a cataclysm, although ordinary limestone tuffs are formed by the deposition of calcium carbonate or siliceous matter from solution at the places where mineral springs emerge on the earth's surface. Usually, as a result of the weathering of rocks, water dissolves chemical compounds, forming a solution, from which secondary precipitation occurs and the formation of new rocks. Dwellings, temples, structures, monuments have such a form that it seems that they were NOT KNOCKED IN THE ROCKS, but "molded", as if from plasticine, from a kind of concrete solution.

Download a book on deciphering the Etruscan and Phrygian scripts.

Author: Evgeny Koparev

Recommended: