More recently, physics and biology have been enriched by a number of new discoveries that can radically affect our previous fundamental ideas about gravity, inertia, electricity, magnetism, wave phenomena, the reason for the design of living organisms, and much more. It turned out that all of the above is based on just one single effect, different sides of which we observe, giving different names to its manifestations. All these sensational discoveries were made thanks to another discovery, and no less sensational - the unraveling of the "secrets" of the design and shape of the Egyptian pyramids, which for centuries were mistakenly considered to be pyramidal tombs of the ancient Egyptian pharaohs. The author of the discoveries, a researcher at the Laboratory of Experimental Optics of the St. Petersburg Research Institute of Biological Monitoring, Andrei VERZHBITSKY, tells.
Contrary to the prevailing opinion that the Egyptian pyramids are peculiarly arranged tombs of the pharaohs, experiments on the irradiation of limestone pyramids have shown that the pyramids are not tombs at all, but extremely well-designed dielectric refractor antennas, the shape of which implies their use for radio communication to distant and ultra-long-range distance. An analysis of the operation of antennas of such an unusual configuration revealed that they have unique capabilities from the point of view of modern antenna technology, due to which a pyramidal dielectric antenna is not only not inferior, but in many parameters is significantly superior to any modern parabolic antenna.
In particular, a comparison of the design of the pyramid and the parabolic antenna showed that the logic of their internal structure is the same, and tunnels, dead ends, rooms, burial chambers, temples and other supposedly "ritual" structures that are incomprehensible to historians are in fact size waveguides, stubs, cavity resonators, filters and other elements used in microwave technology. At the same time, not differing in the logic of the device and the principle of operation from any modern parabolic antenna, the ancient pyramidal antenna has such functions as homing at a moving space target without using rotary mechanisms, is efficient in conditions of complete absence of electricity, has a higher efficiency when working on long-range distance, selects identical signals,coming from one direction, has a system for automatically maintaining the level of the received signal, a converter of electromagnetic waves into sound without a single radio element, has a lower noise temperature due to the absence of side "lobes" of the directional pattern and the absence of high-frequency currents on the stone edges. It turns out that whatever parameter of a modern antenna we take, the pyramid either does not need it at all, or the modern antenna immediately loses out in comparison with the pyramid. The reasons for the delusion of historians also became clear: following the imagination of primitive observers, it is simply impossible to unravel the "secrets" of the pyramid design, for all their apparent simplicity. Only the successes of modern astronautics and space antenna technology have made it possible to answer these previously seemed completely insoluble questions. It has a system for automatically maintaining the level of the received signal, an electromagnetic wave-to-sound converter without a single radio element, has a lower noise temperature due to the absence of side lobes of the directional pattern and the absence of high-frequency currents on the stone edges. It turns out that whatever parameter of a modern antenna we take, the pyramid either does not need it at all, or the modern antenna immediately loses out in comparison with the pyramid. The reasons for the delusion of historians also became clear: following the imagination of primitive observers, it is simply impossible to unravel the "secrets" of the pyramid design, for all their apparent simplicity. Only the successes of modern astronautics and space antenna technology have made it possible to answer these, previously seemed completely insoluble questions. It has a system for automatically maintaining the level of the received signal, an electromagnetic wave-to-sound converter without a single radio element, has a lower noise temperature due to the absence of side lobes of the directional pattern and the absence of high-frequency currents on the stone edges. It turns out that whatever parameter of a modern antenna we take, the pyramid either does not need it at all, or the modern antenna immediately loses out in comparison with the pyramid. The reasons for the delusion of historians also became clear: following the imagination of primitive observers, it is simply impossible to unravel the "secrets" of the pyramid design, for all their apparent simplicity. Only the successes of modern astronautics and space antenna technology have made it possible to answer these previously seemed completely insoluble questions.
Let's consider the operation of the pyramidal antenna in more detail
1. Unlike modern parabolic antennas, which use double modulation of the signal in the receive and transmit mode (the carrier radio frequency and the modulation signal superimposed on it, in fact), the pyramidal antenna uses for transmission over much longer distances and waves of much longer (lower frequency), which and determines its gigantic dimensions and the dimensions of all its internal elements. Quite right: with an increase in the wavelength, the communication range also increases, and the "hit" of the frequency of such a wave in the sound range makes double modulation unnecessary, limiting itself to only one. In this case, the sequence of the arrangement of the internal elements of the pyramid ceases to be a "secret", exactly corresponding to the logic of receiving and extracting a signal. In this version, the stone structure exactly repeats the structure of the waveguide paths of modern parabolic antennas, differing from them only in size and use instead of metal waveguides - similar dielectric ones formed by stone walls and working in the same way.
2. The principle of operation of a pyramidal antenna is the same as that of a parabolic antenna - collecting the energy of the incident wave from a large area into one point, called a focus. The difference is that the focus of the parabolic antenna is located in front of it, since its operation is based on the reflection effect, and the focus is pyramidal inside it, since its operation is based on the refraction effect, which is well known from optics. For this reason, the principle of operation of the pyramid differs little from the principle of operation of a conventional optical lens that collects sunlight at one point. There are only two differences between the lens and the pyramid: instead of a spherical refractive surface, several flat ones (in the form of the faces of a regular pyramid) and the use of opaque (limestone) instead of a transparent dielectric (glass) due to the operation of the antenna in the "invisible" radio wave range.
3. The sides of the pyramid form the dielectric body of the pyramidal refractor, in the focus of which there is a hollow cavity resonator, which historians call the "burial" chamber. The seemingly strange pyramidal shape of the refractor is actually forced. The fact is that when an antenna installed on Earth works in the direction of deep space, the antenna does not work by itself, but knowingly being inside a huge lens surrounding the Earth (Van Allen belt), when the refractive index of this lens at a considerable distance from the Earth's surface increases significantly … Simply put, the pyramid is an integral part (terminal) of a giant interplanetary centered optical system designed to communicate with a similar pyramidal terminal,installed on another planet and separated from it by the natural lens envelopes of these planets. By the way, failure to take into account the refraction of these lenses is one of the reasons for the loss of several automatic stations sent towards Mars, when the curvature of the flat wavefront of parabolic antennas supporting directional radio communication with increasing distance sharply reduces their efficiency. Hence the conclusion: the use of antennas for distant space communications, structurally corresponding to the ancients, is the most competent technical solution than the use of parabolic antennas. The same conclusion follows from a comparison of the modern and ancient methods of pointing an antenna at a space target. Failure to take into account the refraction of these lenses is one of the reasons for the loss of several automatic stations sent to Mars, when the curvature of the plane wavefront of parabolic antennas supporting directional radio communication with increasing distance sharply reduces their effectiveness. Hence the conclusion: the use of antennas for distant space communications, structurally corresponding to the ancients, is the most competent technical solution than the use of parabolic antennas. The same conclusion follows from a comparison of the modern and ancient methods of pointing an antenna at a space target. Failure to take into account the refraction of these lenses is one of the reasons for the loss of several automatic stations sent towards Mars, when the curvature of the plane wavefront of parabolic antennas supporting directional radio communication with increasing distance sharply reduces their effectiveness. Hence the conclusion: the use of antennas for distant space communications, structurally corresponding to the ancients, is the most competent technical solution than the use of parabolic antennas. The same conclusion follows from a comparison of the modern and ancient methods of pointing an antenna at a space target.structurally corresponding to the ancients, represents the most competent technical solution than the use of parabolic antennas. The same conclusion follows from a comparison of the modern and ancient methods of pointing an antenna at a space target.structurally corresponding to the ancients, represents the most competent technical solution than the use of parabolic antennas. The same conclusion follows from a comparison of the modern and ancient methods of pointing an antenna at a space target.
Promotional video:
4. Modern antennas for directional space communications are equipped, as a rule, with a system of electric motors that perform mechanical antenna guidance. For low-flying targets moving in near-earth orbit, this guidance method is quite acceptable. However, with an increase in distance, the situation changes to the opposite: with a significant distance from the target, not so much the target moves relative to the Earth, but the earth's surface with an antenna located on it and pointed at this target due to the axial rotation of the planet, is shifted relative to the target. And if so, then why twist the antenna if the Earth is moving anyway? It is this "passive" method of guidance that is provided in all fixed pyramidal antennas, when, with the illusion of the target "moving" across the sky from one horizon line to another, the antenna does not follow the target,and a part of the signal incident on it from the emitting target moves along its surface, doing the same work for it. At the same time, no matter what point in the firmament is a cosmic object, the "rays" coming from it and refracted by the pyramid's edges will always exactly follow its focus in accordance with the conditions of the law of refraction.
five. As the Earth rotates, the pyramidal antenna installed on its surface will sooner or later move from the radio visibility zone to the radio shadow zone, when the target will not “see” the antenna and communication with it will cease. Here we come across another brilliant engineering solution, which consists in the fact that in place of some antennas that go beyond the horizon, others appear: in place of the Egyptian ones - the pyramids of the Canary Islands; at their entry - the pyramids of the Sargasso Sea, the Yucatan Peninsula and Mexico, which in turn will replace the pyramids of China and Tibet, and then the cycle will repeat. Thus, the applied guidance system allows one of the antenna groups to always be in the field of view of a remote space observer, which is especially important in conditions of the same axial rotation of another planet with which the communication session is maintained. But this is not the only point here. The fact is that all the indicated pyramids are exactly in the same plane, which does not coincide with the dashed line of the northern tropic, having a slope of about 11 degrees towards Canada. That is, exactly the same slope as the slope of the plane of the Earth's magnetic field and its magnetic axis in the same direction!
What does this mean? And this means the following: to transmit information over gigantic distances, the developers of pyramidal antennas did not generate electromagnetic energy, but used the Earth's own powerful field of the same nature by simply modulating it! Here is the solution! And indeed: why generate electromagnetic energy if we have at our disposal the planet's magnetic field, which is already spread over gigantic distances?
It turns out that the ancient engineers knew how to use the Earth's own magnetic field to transmit information, but we, with all scientific and technical achievements, do not know how? This is not true. But this is a topic for a separate conversation regarding the principles of information transfer.
Revealing the "secrets" of the ancient pyramids will reveal many impeccably elegant, even from a modern scientific and technical point of view, engineering solutions.
