"Veles's Book" Is Not A Fake, But A Written Source Of Vedic Russia - Alternative View

"Veles's Book" Is Not A Fake, But A Written Source Of Vedic Russia - Alternative View
"Veles's Book" Is Not A Fake, But A Written Source Of Vedic Russia - Alternative View

Video: "Veles's Book" Is Not A Fake, But A Written Source Of Vedic Russia - Alternative View

Video:
Video: Slavic Vedas 2024, May
Anonim

In previous centuries, the falsifiers of history have worked hard to first destroy many pre-Christian written sources and then create a bunch of forgeries, making edits and changes to the surviving chronicle sources, such as the Tale of Bygone Years, on which many of the Normanist conclusions are based. Both the facts of editing and the substitution of individual sheets of this chronicle have already been proven, especially to substantiate the "far-fetched" hypothesis that Prince Rurik allegedly belonged to the Normans.

On the other hand, those pre-Christian written sources of Vedic Russia, which suddenly began to “emerge” from oblivion, destroying the “truthfulness” of the falsified history, were immediately declared “forgeries” and “falsifications”. This fate did not escape the “Velesov Book”, which tells the many thousand-year and rich history of the Russian people, who built cities and had many benefits of civilization long before “civilized” Europe.

But despite all these cries of "God's chosen" historians and their faithful servants, the scientific examination carried out by a group of scientists led by A. Klesov fully confirmed the authenticity of the Veles Book, written before the arrival of the "creators of Slavic writing" Cyril and Methodius to Russia.

Here is what Y. Maksimenko writes about this in his research book "The Truth and Lies of Academic History":

Thus, "Veles's Book" is another "nail" in the coffin of the history falsifiers who invented the myth of the "savagery and uncivilization" of the Slavs and the Russian people, and the absence of statehood, language and ancient history before the arrival of imaginary "civilizers" in Russia, some of which no writing was created, but only reformed the already existing Christian church for the purpose, and the other had nothing to do with the Normans, but belonged to one of the branches of the ancient Russian princes.

And, of course, the myth of the “savagery” of Russia and the “civilization” of Europe is refuted by Anna Yaroslavna's letters to her father, who from a normal civilized state went straight to the center of the European “gadyushnik” full of wild morals and unsanitary conditions. All this perfectly explains by whom and for what, over the course of a number of centuries, the substitution and falsification of Old Russian history was carried out.

An important role in this falsification of history was played by the Romanovs (the surname itself indicates their owners from the Vatican), who destroyed many ancient Russian written sources of Vedic Rus under the pretext of their restoration, including the ancestral books of the upper classes. And without this total destruction and falsification of ancient sources, it was impossible to rewrite history for the sake of parasitic and satanic forces.

michael101063 ©

Recommended: