According to the German academician G. F. Miller, Siberia “doesn’t eat a historical zimle”, and there was always a Stone Age on it, up to the 17th century, which is confirmed by the “historians” of Siberia, as well as the fact that there were never any Indo-Aryans in it. The history of the Russian Trans-Urals is a story about how its small Mongoloid peoples from century to century hunted, caught fish, raised deer and were treated by shamans. And this is despite the fact that Ermak's Cossacks everywhere found Russian place names, mountains of iron slag, ruins of cities, blast furnaces and forge forges. Miller, who spent ten years in Siberia, also could not help but see them.
Why did the Vatican decide to erase Siberia from the historical map of the world and why its Jesuit agents for 250 years were busy composing for its "underbelly", that is, China, a fable about allegedly the most ancient "Chinese" civilization on Earth. From Novgorodov's book, we learn that back in 1516, the rector of the University of Krakow and, no doubt, the Jesuit and freemason Matvey Mekhovsky published a brochure "Notes on the Two Sarmatians", in which, on command from the Jesuit "Central Committee", he suddenly spoke about Siberia in a caricatured light:
“In these (Siberian) countries they don't plow, they don't sow … they live in huts made of twigs. Forest life also made people look like foolish beasts: they dress in rough animal skins, sewn together at random, most of them stiffen in idolatry, worshiping the sun, moon, stars, forest animals and everything that comes along."
As you can see, "artillery preparation" on the eve of the historic funeral of Siberia began even before Matteo Ricci's "business trip" to China, and G. Miller to Siberia.
This saying, "naturally", has long been brought into the world, but for some reason the "experts" did not think to look into the works of the Icelandic poet Snorri Sturlusson (1179-1241), the very one who wrote down the Icelandic folk sagas "The Younger Edda" and was the author geographical treatise "Circle of the Earth". He visited Asia, ie, Siberian Russia, during the period of the next temperature maximum of the 11th – 13th centuries. Here's what he writes:
“From north to east and to the very south stretches a part called Asia. In this part of the world, everything is beautiful and magnificent, there are possessions of earthly fruits, gold and precious stones. There is the middle of the earth. And because the earth itself is there in everything and is more beautiful and better, the people inhabiting it are also distinguished by all their gifts: wisdom and strength, beauty and all kinds of knowledge. A city was built near the middle of the earth, which won the greatest fame."
This hail in the "middle of the earth" was the city of Kambalyk, which Western European cartographers marked in the upper reaches of the Ob. If according to NHF-N, the Italian traveler Marco Polo was not beyond the Urals and studied Siberia in the libraries of the Russians, then Novgorodov came to the conclusion that Marco Polo was still in Siberia, lived in Kambalyk for 17 years and left us very interesting essays [147]. This "Book …" tells that the city of Kambalyk had 24 miles in circumference (perimeter). For comparison, the then Constantinople had a perimeter of 18 miles.
In Kambalyk there were 12 gates with a thousand guards at each. A thousand or more carts of silk arrived in the city every day. 25 thousand prostitutes “honestly worked” in the city. (In 1878, four million London in 1878 lived 24 thousand prostitutes.) The very famous Arab traveler Rashid ad-din points out that in 1300 in Kambalyk there were archived and other books for the past five thousand years!
Promotional video:
In the middle of the 17th century, one of the first envoys of Russia in China after the establishment of power there by the Cossacks-Manzhurs was the Moldavian philosopher Milescu Spafari, who served as the translator of the Ambassadorial order in Moscow. He wrote:
“… and not only the size of Asia is more than other parts of the world, but also by an abundance of everything that a person needs, especially in antiquity it surpasses all parts, because in Asia paradise was created from God, and our primordial forefathers Adam and Eve were immediately created and their generation lived there before the flood. Likewise, after the flood, all languages and dwellings were divided from Asia to other parts of the world: in Asia, faith began, civil customs, cities to build, writing and teaching began from there … and that's why the noblest Asia is worthy of other parts of the world …”.
It is clear: Yermak's Cossacks found Siberia harsh, deserted and abandoned. But why, in relation to Siberia, is it not taken into account that in it, as in other regions of the Earth, both the climate and historical epochs have changed? The presence of such a powerful urban culture in Siberia suggests that earlier, with a milder climate, there were periods of rapid prosperity in Siberia. It was from Siberia that powerful migratory streams of the Indo-European Aryans went to Mesopotamia, the Mediterranean, Asia Minor, the Northern Black Sea region, India!
For the first time, the French aristocrat Count Arthur de Gobineau wrote in the middle of the 19th century that Siberia is the ancestral home of the Aryans-Indo-Europeans [149]. The Aryans left behind a powerful toponymic trace and the ruins of numerous cities. The last to leave Siberia were the Slavs-Scythians, next to whom the Proto-Germans, known as the Goths, lived in the marshes of Vasyuganya (Western Siberia).
Mikhailo Lomonosov wrote about the early Slavs “… that they moved from the east from Asia to Europe, to the west at different times by different roads; the same is evident from the above and the following about the Ross, Slavic Varangians”[150]. The statement of Mikhail Vasilyevich - a world-class Russian genius - is quite certain, nevertheless, it is not Lomonosov who is considered the "father of Siberian history", but the visiting German G. F. Miller.
By the time of Yermak's arrival, at the end of the 16th century beyond the Urals, the state of the Indo-Europeans was gone, but there were all sorts of kaganates: Turkic, Uyghur, Kyrgyz, etc. But the history of Siberia is not only the last three centuries - it goes into the depths of tens of thousands years old! Novgorodov writes:
“The Caucasians created a great northern civilization in Siberia, but the history of this civilization is the history of a successive exodus, migration to the southern and western regions of Eurasia. Among the peoples - settlers from Siberia - one can include the Hittites, Pelasgians, Wends, Indians, Cimmerians, Scythians, Celts, Goths, Slavs and many other peoples. Almost everywhere the appearance of Siberian migrants is accompanied by the formation of new centers of civilization (Crete, Harappa, Hittite kingdom). In Siberia, the ruins of cities remained from the departed peoples. These cities were described by Arab and European travelers and writers, and in the most recent years are beginning to be discovered by archaeologists. Such is Chicheburg in the Novosibirsk region."
In the event of the exodus of any people, regardless of the reasons, some part of it remains at least for the repose of the spirit of the ancestors, hovering over the abandoned graves. It can even be accepted as law. It would be very useful for us to find such "stubborn" Rus in Siberia. And they really are. Boris Godunov at the end of the 16th century sent intelligence to Siberia headed by Fyodor Dyak, who reported:
“There in unknown eastern countries are full of Russian people … What kind? - And everyone … They have been there for a long time who trade, who hunts, and who takes tribute from samoyad in their favor thieves.
G. F. Miller also confirms the fact that there were many Russians in pre-Ermak Siberia and adds that they had cities: "The general rumor confirms that Surgut was built instead of the former Russian town …"
Tomsk ethnographer Galina Ivanovna Pelikh established that ten generations before the arrival of Yermak, "a large array of Russian people" numbering ten thousand families moved to Siberia in the XIV century, and before that they lived "beyond the Don by the warm sea" on the Samara River. Their descendants still call themselves Samarans. Some of the "Samarans" bear the surname Kayalov, given along the Kayala River.
In addition to the "Samarans", many other Russians, undoubtedly, continued to live in Siberia, because the Russian toponymic layer of Siberia was too huge, which only a small group of Volga Rus could not leave. Pelikh suggests that the Samara people call the Yaik River Don. The Samara River really exists and flows into the Volga opposite the Zhiguli.
The local Mongoloid population called the indigenous Russians who did not leave Siberia "Pajo". Unfortunately, the ethnographer Pelikh failed to establish the etymology of this word. The Hansi, Mansi and Selkups treated Samara people very well for their high spiritual qualities, for their "uncompromising honesty" and respect for the natives. They were wary of the Cossacks of Ermak and the Russians who came for them because of their greed and rudeness.
The original old-timers preserved their ancient culture for a long time and said "komoni" instead of horses, "rock" instead of birch bark, "eyelid" in the meaning of a dish, a tray, "stone" in the meaning of a mountain range, etc. In European Russia, such semantic archaisms as say, "komoni", were not used already in the 15th century, in any case, they are no longer in the Zadonshchina. It is no coincidence that ethnographers note that the "texts of epics recorded in the Ob region show great closeness to the common Old Russian epic" and emphasize: "… perhaps nowhere, except for northern Russia, has such an old Russia preserved as in Siberia."
The “Samara people” addressed each other as “bratelko”, “Mikhalko”. Compared to the Cossacks of Ermak and in general with the new settlers, they were distinguished by much greater strength, endurance, "size" and energy. However, three centuries later, a miracle of the Siberian transformation occurred with the descendants of those Yermakovs, Cossacks:
“Comparison of recruits from Russia and Siberia during the Russian-Japanese war of 1904–1905. showed the doctors that the European Russians were “shallow, pale, narrow-chested. The face is smudged - it can be seen that before the service they ate badly at home and grew up at hard work. Eyes frozen … But Siberians are definitely a completely different breed. They grew (a head taller), with weathered, healthy copper-red faces … Chest, that is your anvil. And the hands - God forbid getting caught in them in an unkind moment … They say to themselves: "Our Tomsk people are serious, once they hit it, but they won't need more" (from the memoirs of the military doctor VN Nemirovich-Danchenko).
Wherever the Russians came after Yermak, they found Russian names everywhere, especially in the north of Siberia. For example, Lukomorye is called the right bank of the Ob on the Western European maps of the 17th century. And on the map of G. Sanson (Rome, 1688) the land in the basins of the rivers Tom, Chulym, Keti and partly the Yenisei is called Lukomorye. In addition to Lukomorye and Samarov, there are also rivers in the Ob region: Kiya, Kozhukh, Kerch (Kemerovo region), Oka (Irkutsk region), Polos near Tomsk, etc.; villages: Chumay, Karacharovo, Zlatogorka, Lebyazhka, Lebedania, etc.
What prevents us from concluding that from r. Kii came the name of Kiev, that the Chumatsky Way ran through Chumai, that epics about Russian heroes are connected with Zlatogorka and Karacharov, that the Siberian Lukomorye inspired A. S. Pushkin, the lines of the prologue to the poem "Ruslan and Lyudmila"?
And in the Far East from the Neolithic times, Russian toponyms have also been left: Amur, Ussuri, Pidan, Manzovka, Iman, Bikin, Alchan, Kiya, Ko, Tetyukha, Kultukha, Khutsin and many others. dr.
Toponymy specialists have established that in Siberia, many toponyms are explained on the basis of Indo-Aryan, Iranian, Slavic and Old Germanic languages. A well-known specialist in toponymy in the USSR E. M. Murzaev wrote:
“The more knowledge is accumulated about the geographical names of the northern part of Central Asia or the adjacent southern part of Siberia (that is, to the“strip”of the Great Turan of ancient Russia. - O. G.), the more clearly Indo-European toponymic elements appear in the regions, where for many centuries the Turkic, Mongolian, Samoyed and other non-Indo-European languages prevailed."
And indeed it is. If the very first inhabitants of Siberia were the Türks, then we would not find Indo-European roots in the local toponyms. However, the opinion of not only E. M. Murzaeva, but also M. V. Lomonosov, Zh. A. Gobino and other scientists are still not recognized.
The fact that Caucasians migrated to Siberia from Europe, starting from the Paleolithic, Neolithic and further into the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age, was scientifically proven in the monograph by AM Maloletko “Ancient peoples of Siberia” (Tomsk. Publishing house of TSU, 1999). For this work, the author was awarded the Demidov Prize, which is considered the Siberian analogue of the Nobel Prize.
What important truth are they trying to obscure with all this?
Here is what Novgorodov writes:
“… The Siberian situation was actually diametrically opposite: the Caucasians and Indo-Europeans did not penetrate into Siberia at the later stages of the settlement of these cold expanses, but were born here. In other words, the Caucasoid genes, most likely, were not brought into Siberia from outside, but were born in Siberia. Here, in the last three million years, under the influence of the global climatic process, Eurasians have concentrated, and here the "cold blows" led to genetic adaptive mutations and the birth of a boreal blonde race, called the Aryan. The ethnomigration process in the metal era had the opposite direction, from Siberia to Europe and to South and Southeast Asia."
And further:
“Reproducing rapidly in Siberia under conditions of abundant food, adapting to cold conditions, the proto-Siberians acquired a long nose to warm the air, white skin for biochemical production of vitamin D when exposed to solar radiation (so that rickets did not develop in children), a light iris of the eyes, long limbs and tall stature to speed up movement across the savannah and other Caucasian features. Thus, the formation of the Caucasian race in Siberia, the Siberian localization of the ancestral home of the Caucasians, seems to be more factually substantiated and more logical theoretically than in Europe …
The finds in Diring-Yuryakh (the mouth of the Lena River - O. G.) show that the entire last three millionth anniversary, that is, in fact, the entire Ice Age, Siberia was the arena of the formation of man, the acquisition of racial characteristics inherent in northern races. In addition, it is here, in the north of Asia, that the severe cold for three million years forced a person to work, that is, served as a powerful stimulus to work. As the German anthropologist Moritz Wagner brilliantly foresaw, it was the north of Asia that was the extratropical ancestral home of mankind. And the north of Asia is Siberia."
Russian culture and the Russian language were the wonderful weapons with which the Indo-European Russians conquered the whole world, forming the World Proto-Empire Great Russia. And how else to call it, if in ancient times they spoke and wrote in Russian in all corners of the globe, starting from the Neolithic and even Paleolithic times? My assumption about the existence in the Neolithic and later times of the World Proto-empire Great Russia was expressed in the book "White Horse of the Apocalypse".
Great = "Mongolian" Empire of Ancient Russia, opened by a team of scientists from Moscow State University under the leadership of Academician A. T. Fomenko was also worldwide. It existed from about the middle of the 14th to the end of the 16th centuries [158], and its creation was a heroic, albeit naive attempt to restore the former order in the life of the super-ethnos of the Rus.
It will be appropriate here to note that, according to the Arab traveler Rashid ad-Din, Genghis Khan was tall, ruddy-faced, blue-eyed, with a red forelock and a beard, that is, there was not even a trace of Mongolian racial in his appearance … Genghis Khan, famous from the official history, had a Russian surname Temuchin. But Rashid ad-Din does not name her. It doesn't matter to him. Because Genghis Khan is not the name of a person, but the title of the position of a major official in the Russian kingdom of Siberia, responsible for the well-being and prosperity of its small Mongoloid peoples, for he is a CHIN, who speaks the Izheykh Word of KHANam.
Where: "Izheynye" is a synonym for the word "Russians" - a now almost forgotten characteristic-name of the Rus, in the aggregate, bearing in themselves moral and spiritual qualities according to the Letter of the All-World Literacy I-Izhe. The meaning of the rest of the letters in the word "Genghis Khan", I think, is clear without translation. The Russian tsars could well take upon themselves, among others, the title "Chin-Giskhan" as the rulers and patron fathers of the small Mongoloid peoples of the Eurasian continent. Therefore, the developers of the NHF-N are absolutely right, calling the Russian tsars-Rurikovich "Genghis Khan".
In addition to the literature on the New Chronology of Fomenko-Nosovsky, which appeared in the last ten years, not even individual books, but a whole literature on the New Chronology of "Fomenko-Nosovsky", the above, for our Russian happiness, is brilliantly confirmed by the results of decryptions by the academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Valery Alekseevich Chudinov of inscriptions relating to the Iron and Bronze Ages, as well as to the Mesolithic and the Neolithic, which turned out to be executed in Russian. Here are his books:
“Sacred stones and pagan temples of the ancient Slavs” (M., “Grand”, 2004);
"Let's return the Etruscans of Russia" (M., "Generation", 2006);
"Russian Runes" (M., "Alva-First", 2006), "The Universe of Russian Written Language before Cyril" (M., "Alva-Pervaya", 2007);
"Cryptography on Russian Icons" (M., "Alva-First", 2008) and others.
If V. A. Chudinov is an epigraphist, then our contemporary, writer Yuri Dmitrievich Petukhov is a professional historian and archaeologist. Disdaining the imposed dogmas, he set himself the goal of answering the question, who after all were the distant ancestors of the Germans and French, Irish and Lithuanians, Serbs and Ossetians, and in general all Indo-European peoples?
Working hard for the past twenty years, he got the answer:
“They were ancient Rus: not a Russian people in the modern sense of the word, but a super-ethnos of Rus, who became the true creators of the original history of mankind tens of thousands of years ago! It was from them that the Slavs and Greeks, Balts and Germans came from”(from the annotations to the books of Yu. D. Petukhov). Here are the books by Yu. D. Petukhova:
"By the Roads of the Gods" (Moscow, "Metagalaktika", 1998);
“History of the Rus. The oldest era. 40-3 thousand BC e. " (M., "Metagalaktika", 2003);
“Over-evolution. Superethnos Rusov "(M.," Metagalaktika ", 2007);
"Rus of Eurasia" (M., "Veche", 2008);
"Rus of the Ancient East" (Moscow, "Veche", 2008);
"Secrets of Ancient Rus" (M., "Veche", 2008) and others.
Difficulties in establishing this obvious truth in A. T. Fomenko, G. V. Nosovsky, V. A. Chudinova, Yu. D. Petukhov and other brilliant scientists were associated with overcoming the false world history of mankind imposed on us, from which the memory of the World Proto-empire Great Russia, the Great = "Mongolian" empire of Ancient Rus and Siberian Rus was deleted. But not only.
At the same time, starting from the 15th – 17th centuries, people are taught that from the stone ax, the cave way of life, primitive gathering, etc., mankind allegedly moves "along the line of progress" to the shining peaks of the Christian-technocratic civilization.
In fact, everything happens exactly the opposite: from the heights of the former highest spiritual, moral, physical and intellectual power, the Indo-Europeans are inexorably sliding down an invisible inclined into the abyss of spiritual, moral, physical and intellectual degradation, and possibly death.
Machines, computers, etc. technical devices are "prostheses" of the lost intellectual and physical perfection of the white man. In the event of a man-made or natural global catastrophe, Caucasians will lose these "prostheses" and will be a loser in comparison with Negroids, Australoids, Mongoloids and other races that have escaped Christianization and technocratization and therefore have less ability to survive in extreme situations.
N. S. Novgorodov, believing that the north of Siberia should be considered the ancestral home of people of the white race, points to the Taimyr Peninsula ("the tip of the Eurasian wedge"), on which the future "Indo-Europeans" converged at the end of the last ice age, because, due to climate warming, cold-loving mammoths, rhinos and deer moved to the north of Siberia. People followed them.
It was on Taimyr that a happy period began in the life of people in connection with the opportunity to lead a sedentary lifestyle and a household, that is, the process of sociogenesis was launched - the division of labor, the emergence of crafts, arts, writing, town planning and the first experiments in building a state.
“It seems to me that protocivilization arose in Taimyr during a short period of the Holocene climatic optimum. Graphically, the migrations of huge human collectives with the formation of the Ancestral Homeland and the subsequent exodus from it are shown in the figure. All subsequent history of mankind took place under the influence of the First cultural center”.
Not later than III millennium BC e. natives of Taimyr created centers of civilizations of Sumer, Egypt, Harappa, Vinca, Crete, where there were no defensive structures, since there was still no one to defend against. These settlers could be called noble enthusiasts.
But everything became somewhat tougher around the 3rd millennium BC. n. e., when, after the climatic optimum, a gradual cooling began in Siberia, and the nature of migration from Taimyr became forced. But in the vast territories of southern Siberia, the movement of human masses ended: in the forest-steppe zones of southern Siberia there was enough space for everyone. People took up cattle breeding (they made hay for the winter), tillage, the rivers were full of fish, and the forests were full of various animals. The "golden age" of white mankind was continued here.
Thus, the Middle Kingdom-state arose, the name of which was later appropriated by the Great Chinese. It was “middle” because it really was located in the geographical center of the Eurasian continent (our ancestors knew both geography and geometry well!). In the super-long strip of the South Siberian forest-steppe, in comfortable climatic conditions, the Indo-Aryans multiplied to many tens, or even hundreds of millions of people. At least it is known that by the V century. BC e. the Scythian-Siberian world was inhabited by 60–70 million people.
The growth of the white population due to the use of bronze and iron tools of labor, of course, rapidly outstripped the numerical growth of the Mongoloid population with its primitive types of farming, therefore the valleys of the Yellow and Yangtze rivers were soon also densely populated by Indo-Europeans. When there were too many eaters here, the Indo-Aryans found a way out, starting to build giant dams and canals on the Yellow River and other rivers of Southeast Asia in order to increase the cultivated area.
“… it should be emphasized that Russian civilization is broader than the Russian ethnos. Along with the Russians themselves, it includes all those peoples who for centuries lived side by side in the field of Russian cultural and historical gravitation, mutually enriching each other.
But at a certain stage, a confrontation arose between the Russian civilization and the newly emerging Asian-Mongoloid.
The mastery of crafts and irrigated agriculture with the help of the Russians against the background of a semi-subtropical climate contributed to the prosperity of the Mongoloid peoples. The increase in the quantity and quality of food consumed contributed to their explosive reproduction. Having launched their reproductive capabilities at full power, the Asians ousted from the most fertile region of Asia, ie, the future of China, the peace-loving Indo-European Rus, who, due to their high spirituality, could not take the path of physical extermination of their Mongoloid "children".
They simply left there, leaving them a network of giant dams and canals, and in the ground - traces of many cultures and works of art, which the current Chinese "historians" unauthorizedly ascribe to China as extraordinary achievements of its "8000-year" history.
The settled southern Mongoloids and people of the black race, who lived in the Iranian highlands, the south of the Caucasus and Asia Minor, and also multiplied, "politically" began to behave very restlessly. Therefore, after the exodus of the Indo-Europeans from the Yangtze and Yellow River valleys, the Indo-Europeans erected the Great Wall of China in order to prevent the expansion of these multiplying yellow and black children to the north. White people in the south of Siberia themselves became very cramped. It was at this time that masses of new settlers began to disperse in different directions (not to be confused with the Great Migration of Peoples of the 5th century A. D.).
Apparently, after the exodus of the Indo-Europeans from the valleys of the Yangtze and Yellow He rivers, among the then still scattered tribes of the "Great Han", fierce battles began for the possession of the most fertile lands. War of the first unifying emperor Qinshi Huangdi, 300 BC e. there is nothing else but a phantom display of these very events.
The technologies adopted from the Russians were preserved in the memory of several generations of future "Chinese", but were soon forgotten. For example, they molded from clay beautiful sculptures of "terracotta warriors of Emperor Qinshi Huangdi", for their preservation they subjected them to difficult heat treatment, but for some reason they never returned to this "theme".
"Unobtrusive" pressure on Indo-Europeans from actively breeding representatives of "colored races" has always been observed. And today too. Here's what you can read, for example by connecting to the Internet or opening an independent newspaper:
“British people are leaving the country under the pressure of immigrants. In ten years, almost two million citizens have emigrated from the UK, reports The Telegraph, citing data from the National Statistics Service (ONS), part of the UK Statistics Office.
The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) estimates that there are over 5.5 million UK citizens currently living abroad. IPPR spokeswoman Jill Rutter said that a significant proportion of these people left the country after retirement, a testament to the high standard of living in Britain.
Meanwhile, according to other experts, the massive resettlement of the British is due to the influx of a large number of migrants into the country. So, last year 574 thousand guest workers arrived in Great Britain for permanent residence. "Apparently, mass emigration is due to the deterioration of living standards in the UK, overpopulation and queues," - believes Optimum Population Trust expert David Nicholson-Lord.
A downright catastrophic situation develops in South Africa after the “black majority” came to power there: the Indo-Europeans, who created a powerful center of modern civilization in southern Africa, actively emigrate from the country, their “exemplary” agriculture is in a deplorable state, and industry is degrading.
“When migrating, peoples gave old, familiar names to rivers, seas, peaks and settlements. Therefore, an innumerable number of geographic objects such as the North Sea, China, Tanais, Indus and many others in ancient times did not correspond at all to the objects that now bear these names. Hence, a monstrous confusion arises in historical science.
The role of the forest-steppe in this ethnomigration process cannot be overestimated. Due to the comfort of the ecological situation there was an explosive multiplication of ethnic groups, which is reflected in "Avesta" ("people and cattle became cramped") and Jordan's "Getika" ("when a great multitude of people grew up there")."
The middle state was located on a large plain, which could be overcome in four months' journey. The books about which Rashid ad-Din wrote and which were kept in the capital of the Middle State, Kambalyk, were called “ministerial”. Hence, in 3700 BC. e. this state already had ministries. Marco Polo located Kambalyk somewhere in Northern Altai on the northwestern edge of the coal basin - modern Kuzbass, because the inhabitants of Kambalyk used coal to heat the baths (daily in winter and three times a week in summer).
The future Great Han people, who learned hieroglyphic writing and other wisdom from the Russians, visited Kanbalyk and left a description of the Middle State in the treatise "Calendar" ("Xi-xiao-chen"). This calendar was used in Siberia in the XXIII-XVIII centuries. BC e. It was translated and published in 1830 by N. Ya. Bichurin as a phenomenon of purely Chinese culture.
However, the calendar tells about freezing rivers, which together with the ground thaw in spring from under the snow. The population of the Middle Kingdom knows nothing about rice, but grows millet, peas, winter wheat. Pictures of flora and fauna do not correspond to the latitude of the river. Yellow River, that is, 30-40 degrees, where there is no frost. Thus, the Middle State was located outside of today's China - much further north.
“In this state, the compass, paper, silkworm breeding, malleable iron, gimbals, stirrups, transparent bronze mirrors, drilling of wells and the use of gas for heating were invented. The unimaginable antiquity of "Jun Go" suggests that it was formed during the time of the Indo-European community, from which the Indo-Aryans were later separated, then the Hittites and the ancestors of other peoples who settled in Asia Minor and the Mediterranean, including the Wends, Sindi and Mittanians.
Even later, the Iranians separated, and those who remained on the land of their ancestors began to be called Turanians. These included the Slavs and the Rus. Since the Turanian era, the history of the Middle Kingdom can be traced more confidently. After the departure of the Turanians, the state was inherited by the Turks, but it became known as China, in honor of the Khitan-Chinese."
Note that in the old days "China" in Russia was called a distant, very remote area. Moscow Kitay-Gorod was located on the outskirts of Moscow. The inhabitants of the distant suburbs were called "Chinas". The verb "don't wander" suggested not wandering too far. Hence the confusion: the upper reaches of the Ob River on the map of S. Herberstein (1549) is called “the Kambalyk region in China”, and the city of Kambalyk stands on the shore of “China Lake”, although in fact it is Lake Teletskoye.
On the maps of Siberia, Western European cartographers of the XVI-XVII centuries. in addition to Kambalyk, cities are shown: Grustina, Serponov, Kossin, Lyapin, Terom, Tyumen, Ruindizh, etc. Of course, it was not without distortions due to their Latin interpretation. Because Serponov is Serbian Novy, and Kossin is Kosovo. On the map of S. Herberstein, the town of Grustin is located in the vicinity of Kambalyk.
According to Marco Polo and Arab authors, there were no less than two hundred cities and villages near the capital of Siberia Kambalyk, which were connected by paved roads lined with trees. The rivers were blocked by dams, on the dams there were powerful hoist winches for transporting ships through the dams, in many sailing along the rivers and canals that connected the rivers. Bridges were thrown across the rivers. One of them was 600 m long, 24 spans and at the same time was a mill with 24 water wheels. Ten horsemen could ride along it in a row.
Alas, for the supporters of the "unhistoric land" all this seems to be some kind of nonsense. However, the very first attempts in 1999 to use aerial photography brought an amazing result: a large archaeological object was discovered in the Zdvinsky district of the Novosibirsk region. In 2000, it was excavated, and a city with a size of 400 × 650 m was discovered, which existed in the VIII century BC. e.
Bronze and iron items, jewelry, ceramics, as well as items indicating that the inhabitants of the village were engaged in cattle breeding, agriculture and hunting were recovered from the earth, and powerful slag dumps indicate an extremely developed metallurgical production. The first news of the opening of the settlement was ridiculed in the local media. Pseudo-journalists gave the city a mocking name Chichaburg - after the name of the nearby Lake Chicha. The journalists soon had to fall silent, but the name remained.
There are many voids under some modern Siberian cities. For example, the length of ancient underground structures near Tomsk is hundreds of kilometers. There is an assumption that Tomsk stands on the ruins of the old underground city of Grustina.
“In the Avesta and early Zoroastrian myths characterizing the first half of the 1st millennium BC. e., the opponents of the Iranians - the Turanians - are spoken of as a civilized people organized into a state. It possessed a central royal power and had an army of hundreds of thousands of soldiers. The Turanian state was in no way inferior to the Achaemenid state: flourishing cultivated land, gardens, mills, fountains in palaces, merchants from all over the world at bazaars and fairs. The Iranians considered the Turanians older brothers in relation to themselves and paid tribute to them. The Turanians, judging by paleotoponymy, inhabited the forest-steppe zone of Siberia.
The Siberian cities were connected by roads, along which postal and huntsmen communications were carried out. The post stations were called "pits" (hence the Russian word "coachman"). The word "yam" is considered Türkic, but it is also present in Sanskrit, which indicates its great archaism.
The oldest pit in Western Siberia is the city of Yurga. It is located on a latitudinal transport route, along which jade was transported to Europe from the Baikal region back in the Neolithic. Later, the Seima-Turbino bronzes (i.e., arsenic bronzes of Taimyr. - O. G.), then the Scythian triad (i.e. objects of the Scythian-Siberian unity, expressed in the similarity of objects: weapons, horse harness and " animal style "in art. - OG), then the Turks went to Europe, then the Moscow highway laid and, finally, the Trans-Siberian railway was built"
Oleg Mikhailovich Gusev