Few of ordinary people know that on the site of the present city of Semipalatinsk, located in Northern Kazakhstan, there was once a Russian fortress-star, which was called "Semipalatnaya". Actually, from this name of the fortress, the name of the city itself originated. Even fewer people know that initially this fortress belonged to the Great Tartary and was one of the defensive structures of the Irtysh line in southern Siberia.
The famous Russian writer, traveler, researcher of the secrets of ancient civilizations A. Kadykchansky in his book "Small Encyclopedia of Great Tartaria", talking about the wars of the heirs of Genghis Khan with reference to the book of Abulgachi-Bayadur-Khan "Genealogical story about the Tartars", published in 1788 in St. Petersburg, writes the following:
About the fate of the fortress, it is known that after the complete destruction in 1660-1670 during the internecine wars between the Dzhungars of the ancient city of Dorzhinkit, already in 1718, moving along the Irtysh, Vasily Cheredov with his detachment chose a place to found a fortress on the right bank. By the time the fortress was founded, seven large buildings remained from the ancient city of Great Tartary, which is why the fortress was named "Semipalatnaya". It is possible that it was precisely this military detachment of the Russian emperor that the ancient library was discovered on the ruins of the ancient city.
Whether the Russian military built this fortress from scratch or used the remains of ancient structures is not known for certain. But the most ancient plan of the new fortress is the "Plan of the Semipolatnaya fortress of 1781", which is presented at the beginning of this post. At the same time, independent researchers are well aware that many "fortresses-stars" of the inter-Flood period (between the catastrophes of the late 17th and mid-19th centuries) were built on an older granite foundation of the structures of a single Vedic ancient civilization destroyed during the catastrophe of the late 17th century. This is how, for example, the famous Peter and Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg was built, which has an orientation towards the antediluvian pole located in Greenland.
So, what is strange about this fortress from 1781. Pay attention to the fact that the diagram of the fortress itself is drawn strictly vertically and horizontally. But here is the wind rose, showing the position of the cardinal points is oriented with an offset to the east, i.e. already with an orientation to the new pole. We know that on all normal maps and schemes, north is always strictly vertical above or below.
Promotional video:
This is how, for example, the plan of the city of Semipalatinsk from 1810 was executed. And on it, north is vertically up. At the same time, it is well seen that the bastions of the fortress are oriented towards the previous pole. Why, on the plan of 1781, the image of the fortress is not made exactly the same?
By the way, this is not the first time I have come across such a fact on the maps of those years, and personally it seems to me that the plan of 1781 was drawn from some more ancient, still antediluvian source, made with the old orientation of the poles. And in order not to suffer with the deployment of the fortress in a new projection, those who redrawn this plan at the beginning of the 18th century simply applied a new arrangement of the cardinal points with the help of the "wind rose". And all this may indicate that. that the Russian military was building a new fortress precisely on the basis of an older bastion.
Of course, this version still requires verification, but the oddities with the 1781 plan and the orientation of the fortress to the old pole clearly testify in its favor. As well as in favor of the hypothesis of the independent researcher O. Pavlyuchenko that the last pole shift occurred just during the catastrophe of the late 17th century, which, very likely, was the result of a destructive planetary war with the use of high-power weapons. So, maybe it was then that the ancient city of white stone was destroyed here, which A. Kadykchansky called "the pearl of Great Tartary"?
michael101063 ©