Weather oddities necessarily and always lead to reflections on whether and not "shelling" us from climate weapons. Such thoughts are also suggested by this summer, which seems to have changed places with autumn.
The first conspiracy theory of conspiracy was expressed by State Duma deputy Alexei Zhuravlev. Directly on the air of the federal channel, he said: the use of climate weapons could provoke weather anomalies.
Nothing concrete, just an assumption - they say, there is a certain malicious unit that has been tested by the West for a long time, and nothing prevents official Washington from using it. This was enough to get the public excited. They immediately remembered the American research project HAARP, within the framework of which a whole forest of antennas and radars "grew" in Alaska in the late 90s. According to the official version, for the study of the ionosphere and missile defense. However, in 2013 the project was closed. Again, according to the official version.
Have the Americans "revived" HAARP, having figured out how to use its power as a climate weapon, or have they come up with something new? Or maybe they revived and refined the mathematical model of the Earth (an approximate description of the external world, expressed using mathematical symbols. A powerful method of understanding the world, forecasting and management. the Nuclear Winter Project?
After all, as the namesake of the conspiracy deputy, director of the Institute of Regional Problems Dmitry Zhuravlev said to "VM", the mathematical model of the planet easily turns into a "weather warhead."
- If there is a mathematical model, it will tell you where and what needs to be changed in the natural balance for a cataclysm to begin, and what consequences to expect, - the expert explains. - If the state uses it and finds a way, say, to slightly change the current in the ocean, then the process will go on by itself. Another thing is that it is necessary to distinguish between two questions: is it possible to use climate weapons in principle and whether the weather cataclysms that we observe are considered its consequences. To the first question, I would answer: "Yes, maybe." In Gorbachev's times, when everything secret was becoming clear, Academician Nikita Moiseev (the head of the project on the development of a mathematical model from the Soviet side) told us, then students of Moscow State University, how easily it can be reoriented into a threat. But the current vagaries of the weather are hardly the result of the use of climate weapons. First, they repeat themselves too often: it is more logical and cheaper to create one large-scale disaster. Second, climatologists talk about general climate change and predict that the weather turmoil will stretch over the next 30 years.
Climatologists, by the way, generally consider climate weapons a myth.
- Climate changes are caused by an unprecedented increase in greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, - explained the head of the climate monitoring department of the Institute of Global Climate and Ecology named after Academician Yu. A. Israel Mikhail Bardin. - And they have not yet led to really dangerous consequences, although we are talking about the activities of the entire industry for a century. And the effect of the use of climate weapons will inevitably be global and will amaze those who use it. As for the weather, there are no special "oddities". Larger anomalies were also observed in different years.
Promotional video:
INTERESTING
We also have a project for studying the ionosphere and radio wave propagation, similar to the American HAARP. In 1981, the Sura radio complex was installed in the Nizhny Novgorod region. While there are several international treaties limiting meteorological experiments, the United States has repeatedly accused Russia of using the Sura to trigger hurricanes and change their trajectory. The Americans are still convinced that the most powerful hurricane in US history, hurricane Katrina, which drowned New Orleans in 2005, is the result of a climatic "shelling" from the Russian side.