The first artifact is a strange thing from the top photo. If we rely on simple logic and do not catch up with fiction, then it resembles a kind of vessel for storing liquid.
But why does a simple vessel need such a complex and unusual shape?
To be honest, the artifact reminds me of the effect of the Cargo cult on the weak in development of ancient people.
Painfully complex and tricky shape for a simple bowl. But if we assume that stupid ancient people saw a certain device of the gods and decided to repeat it, then the situation takes a logical turn.
Although, who knows, maybe this is a really simple container.
Next, we have an interesting artifact (or rather a fragment) from the Turkish Museum.
This time we are dealing with a more mysterious find. From the very beginning, it should be said that its purpose remains a big question.
Promotional video:
Despite the impressive damage, we can roughly imagine what the artifact looked like in its original state.
But for what purpose did the ancient people create such a complex thing? It is difficult to imagine even one simple explanation for this find.
However, the biggest secret of the item lies in its processing.
When creating it, a tool was used that leaves traces similar to modern equipment. This is perfectly noticeable in individual areas and in the quality of processing and accuracy of small parts.
Who in ancient times had such tools and capabilities?
According to the official versions of history, this cannot be.
But the existence of an artifact is a fact and it needs to be explained, even if one has to go beyond the accepted versions.
This means that in ancient times there were technological tools, and therefore a civilization that had reached an appropriate level of development.
There are several artifacts in the Cairo Museum of Antiquities, the existence of which contradicts the official versions of history.
See how I came to this conclusion.
Officially, historians consider ancient myths and legends to be simple inventions, especially those that tell about the ancient gods and their deeds.
Accordingly, the existence of the ancient gods is officially denied. Now let's return to our exhibits and draw a simple conclusion.
If the ancient gods and all their things (jewelry, staves, clothes, etc.) were invented, then where did the artifacts that form the headdress of the ancient goddess Isis come from in the museum?
Were the Egyptians so stupid that they invented gods and their attributes, and then started making invented objects? I would rather believe in a flat earth than in such a turn of events.
Since ancient objects or their prototypes remained, it means there were originals, and this proves the reality of the existence of the ancient gods.
This I have not yet touched on the theme with the image of a strange "energy ball" in the headdress of Isis, which is officially considered the symbols of the Sun (if I am not mistaken).
For there is a possibility that this is not at all a mythical image of our star, but quite a real effect from a certain technology.
Well, let's finish our article with the Sabu disc from the Cairo Museum.
A unique artifact whose purpose is puzzling even scientists. They never came up with a logical explanation for him.
Its complex design suggests the idea of imitating something technological that the Egyptians could contemplate at the ancient gods.
In the future, they tried to reproduce this on their own, but as you might guess, one repetition of the form will not do here. Therefore, the things of the Egyptians did not work as they saw with the gods.
On this we will end.