The population on Earth is only growing every year, but does this mean that the world is becoming cramped? Take China, for example. It is the most populous country in the world. People living in China make up 19% of the total population of the Earth, so many talk about the threat of Chinese expansion. Today, China is home to one billion three hundred and eighty million people. But despite this, there is no overpopulation in China, and all talk about it is pure myth. This is evidenced by dry numbers.
It all depends not on the number of people inhabiting this or that country, but on the population density in relation to the territory. See for yourself. In China, the population density is 139 people per square kilometer. For comparison: in Italy -201 people per square kilometer; in Germany - 229 people per square kilometer; India has 364 people per square kilometer, and England - 395 people per square kilometer - almost three times more than in China. This is who should be cramped in their country, not the Chinese. And if we talk about expansion, then not Chinese, but European.
At the same time, there is no birth control in Europe, unlike China. In the PRC, married couples with two children or more have recently paid fines. Pregnant women gave away a fifth of their salaries. And such a policy has reduced demographic growth from 30% to 10% in 20 years. With the restriction in China, 200 million fewer newborns were born than they would have if there were no sanctions, but China's restrictive policies have led to a noticeable aging of the population.
In China now, the main demographic problem is the inevitable decline in the working-age population. Because of this, today the PRC is gradually abandoning fines for large families.
But if the problem of crowding is not in the number of people living on Earth, then what?
Information war
Some sociologists are inclined to the version that today, a small world is called not by the number of people, but by the density of information flows. There are too many events, phenomena around us; the Internet is replete with news, their number becomes excessively large per unit of time, and social networks with a constant flickering of faces and photos can completely drive you crazy. A person simply has nowhere to hide.
Promotional video:
Due to such informational tightness, a person ceases to feel himself as an individual. It turns into a cog in a huge virtual machine - one of millions, on which, in fact, nothing depends, and such people are easy to manage via the same Internet. Modern society is more suggestible than previous generations. It is enough to throw some idea into the network, and users immediately pick it up and, over time, can no longer understand whether they themselves came to this or prompted them.
Remember the March 2017 riots in Moscow. Most of the protesters were students and schoolchildren - the Internet generation. But who needs to unite the youth and drive them out into the streets with protests? And most importantly why? Maybe to make the world more spacious? At first glance, there is no connection here, but it is not. Today the struggle is being waged with new methods - without physical destruction.
There is no bombing, no destruction of infrastructure - there is psychological, economic, ideological violence. And the restoration of the country in this context is all about the establishment of a new statehood in the same space and, most importantly, the consolidation of this new state, a new country for new masters.
We have already gone through this. In 1942, Hitler formulated the foundations of an occupation policy in the conquered eastern territory. In his brief directive, he wrote just three sentences:
“… It is necessary to reduce the Slavs to sign language. No hygiene, no vaccinations - only vodka and tobacco …”.
The Second World War proved that we cannot be defeated even at the cost of millions of losses. And then it was decided to go the other way. In 1945, CIA Director Allen Dulles wrote a treatise called "Reflections on the implementation of the American post-war doctrine against the USSR." And here's what he suggested:
“Literature, theaters, cinema - everything will depict and glorify the most base human feelings. We will in every possible way support and raise the so-called artists who will plant and hammer into human consciousness the cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal - in short, all immorality. We will pull up spiritual roots, thus shaking generation after generation. And we will always place our main stake on young people - we will begin to expound, corrupt and defile them."
These attacks on the Russian civilization, whatever it is called - the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation - continue and will continue.
A similar doctrine exists in America, apparently even today. At least the mechanisms are the same. But what are the goals pursued by the US authorities and who are "extra people" for them?
Who wants to reduce the nation of Russians
In the mid-80s, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said at a closed meeting:
"… no more than 15 million people should live on the territory of the USSR …"
In her opinion, just such a number of people can really benefit … the West naturally. For the country to be a donor of natural resources, just 15 million are enough, and not the most educated ones.
Redivision of the world is happening constantly. Look at the Soviet period, look at what happened after the collapse of the Soviet Union, look at what transnational corporations are doing now in relation to the whole world, when the world (outside the transnational corporations) becomes only an object of extraction and profit. This is a very serious signal to oppose this globalism. Transnational corporations have no concept of "Motherland". For them, the homeland is the dollar.
In the 90s, Madeleine Albright, the then US Secretary of State, spoke about the same thing. Here is a quote from one of her talks:
"According to the estimates of the world community, it is economically expedient for fifteen million people to live in Russia."
Are the remaining 130 million Russians superfluous for the West?
There are a lot of extra people for those who want to get rid of these “extra people”. In fact, all this talk about the fact that the world is overpopulated is empty, fake. Due to the fact that somewhere there is hunger - this is not a problem of overpopulation - it is a problem of politics and public administration.
Who benefits from such a device? Who is cramped in this world? Who is interested in minimizing the population of the planet, and those who will be left to take advantage of?
Vaccination to reduce the world's population
One of the richest people in the world, Bill Gates, said that vaccines will soon appear that will reduce the world's population. It sounds ominous, especially when you remember that it is his foundation that allocates money to develop and deliver vaccines to the poorest countries. Many experts believe that the real purpose of vaccination is to weaken people and make them more susceptible to disease.
In 2010, at a private conference in California, Bill Gates said:
“… There are almost seven billion people in the world today. This number will rise to about nine billion. Now if we really do a great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we will reduce it by perhaps 10 or 15% …"
It was then about the African continent. By the end of this century, such African countries as Kenya, Uganda, Malawi (which are difficult to find on the map) will outnumber the population of Russia. And this is taking into account the fact that, for example, Malawi is 570 times smaller than Russia!
Bill Gates said that he is very concerned about the problems of Africa, and explained his words as follows:
“… he did not mean a decline in fertility in Africa, but a decline in population growth. In African countries, child mortality is very high, so women give birth a lot. If they have vaccines against the same malaria, for example, then children will stop dying and women will give birth less. After all, the overpopulation of Africa is a direct threat to civilized countries …"
In 2007, Nigeria was ranked third in the world for cybercriminal activity. Then Microsoft, owned by Gates, joined in the fight of the Nigerian authorities against cybercrime. However, over the course of several years, Nigerian scammers have extorted more than $ 12 billion from their victims. Other, more effective methods were needed. Such as, for example, the reduction of people who may become criminals in the future. This is where the new vaccines Gates talked about came in handy. He was in such a hurry that he began testing the drug illegally, before all the relevant approvals. And what is the result?
In Africa, about 6 thousand children have died! Some say that Bill Gates just wanted to make money from this vaccine, but there are those who claim that the vaccine weakened people, making them more susceptible to disease. As they say, the strongest survives, that is, the rich white American. This is the natural selection of the 21st century!
Golden billion
The theory of the golden billion was developed back in the middle of the twentieth century. In the nineties, a book called "The Committee of 300 - Secrets of the World Government" was translated into Russian. Its author John Coleman is an American publicist who, according to his own words, was a former employee of the British intelligence services. For about thirty years, he studied the secret mechanisms of world governance and came to the conclusion that for more than a hundred years global processes have been governed by a single supreme controlling body. It includes influential political figures like Bush the elder or Henry Kissinger, all the royal houses of Europe, the richest family clans of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, and other major financiers.
According to John Coleman, back in the 70s, the Committee of 300 conducted the largest study and found that natural resources on earth are very limited. They are enough for only one billion people to live comfortably. They called him - gold. This golden billion included the populations of the United States, Canada, Western Europe, Israel and Japan.
Russia, according to the world government, has no place in the golden billion, but its resources do not give the committee three hundred peace.
The fact is that behind the term “golden billion” there is a certain concept, namely, developed countries, while maintaining a high level of consumption for their population, will keep the rest of the world in an industrially undeveloped state by political, economic and military methods.
The scheme is as follows - the "golden billion" is at the head, and the rest of the population is its service personnel, serfs. And if suddenly there are too many of them, you can start cleaning. In other words, liquidation. Isn't it an ideology of fascism?
The fascists openly promoted their racial policies. All people were divided into two races: the highest and the lowest. According to the concept of racial hygiene, sterilization and destruction of alcoholics, epileptics, persons with various hereditary diseases was carried out. Today everything happens in secret. The main thing for the golden billion is the manipulation of public consciousness, including in Russia.
As soon as Russia begins to flourish and strengthen, it immediately becomes the main irritant of the world elite. They don't like us because we have the largest territory, because we are strong, because we honor our culture and remember our history. That is why they try to destroy us so often. First in 1917, then in 1991, and now and now.
In the nineties, a liquidation regime came to power, which was intended to liquidate industry, science, education and the people. The natural population decline in the nineties was not at all natural. This was a powerful experiment on our country on the part of our so-called overseas "partners", which took place with the tacit consent (of course, not free) of our "leaders".
The golden billion needs only our natural resources and our territory. Today they are trying to weaken Russia again, including by reducing the population.
Western "values"
More and more waste - less and less clean water; more and more emissions into the atmosphere - fewer fields, but most importantly - more and more people. This means that there will be nowhere to live, nothing to eat or drink, nothing to breathe. The fight against overpopulation has been going on for a long time, but we don't even know what methods. People are imposed on goals and opportunities that can replace traditional family values. Singles can be given benefits in the form of tax breaks or their own home.
Such a policy will increase the number of people abandoning the decision to enter into an early marriage. For women, a system of providing work and education has been developed, which allows to increase interest in a career and vice versa to reduce interest in motherhood. Moreover, today in Russia, at the suggestion of the West, there is an active replacement of all national and moral guidelines.
Under pressure from international organizations, laws are being stubbornly promoted into Russian legislation that contradict both the traditions of our country and public opinion.
Nominally, we have a democratic state and this assumes that the opinion of the majority will be taken into account when making any decisions and laws. However, in the overwhelming majority of cases, opinions are not only not taken into account, but also not brought to the attention of the population.
So, without taking into account the opinion of the majority, demands are being made to allow gay pride parades and legalize same-sex marriage. Some schools are trying to introduce sex education lessons. It is good that another Western innovation has not yet reached us - until a certain age, not to call boys - boys, and girls - girls, motivating this by the fact that children themselves must figure out who they are when they grow up.
Such an upbringing has already been adopted by some Hollywood stars, who calmly dress up their sons in girlish dresses, and their daughters in men's clothes and in this form leave the house with them.
In some kindergartens in the West, children are addressed in the third person, speaking about them - it. Children should play with gender-neutral toys and try on gender-neutral clothing; boys must try on beads, and girls play with cars in order to determine what suits them best. Teens should already be choosing their gender. All this is trying to impose on us the West.
Many Russians perceived this as a real threat to Russia's moral and demographic sovereignty. Therefore, in 2014, a massive AKSIO-4 survey was conducted in Russia. 45 thousand people from all regions of the Russian Federation were interviewed. The task of Axio-4 was to obtain clear data on how Russians feel about the so-called tolerant approach to traditional values, which they are actively imposing on us.
One of the questions sounded like this: "what should be the procedure for adopting laws in the field of family and childhood, laws affecting our values and the norms of coexistence adopted in our country."
Almost 66% stated that such laws should be adopted only following a popular referendum. This survey itself shows how vulnerable we are to alien influence.
However, it is too early to sound the alarm. The respondents have some justification for these results. The point is that people usually don't think hard about these poll topics. And if you go up to a person and ask: is there life on Mars, then with a 99% probability he never thought about it. Accordingly, his answer will be stereotyped, which will not fully reflect his opinion, as if he sat down and thought about this question well.
Nevertheless, Russia has clearly defined its position. Not so long ago, the UN proposed a new formulation of what a family is. Previously, it was a union of a man and a woman, now, at the suggestion of the United States, they would like to designate the family as a union of two citizens. Russia was categorically against and supported by many countries. So the American lobby did not pass. Morality won and the world was divided. There are two poles. But you need to understand that now our moral priorities, our moral superiority are constantly being revised.
The notorious gender, demands to legalize prostitution and soft drugs are imposed on us. And these endless calls for tolerance. And all for what? Only so that we lose our traditions, so that the family ceases to mean anything to us, so that we do not rush to create pairs and reproduce, so that we get sick and die, and most importantly, so that our brains are ready for any introduction of alien ideas.
Speaking of tolerance. This word means tolerance for a new worldview, way of life, behavior and customs, but tolerance is not the same as indifference and also does not mean acceptance of a new worldview or way of life. In this sense, Russia, as a multinational and multi-confessional country, is absolutely tolerant.
Reshaping history
The struggle with the population occurs at all levels of consciousness, including the so-called rethinking of history. The main thing is that everything happens in the interests of the customer. The enslavement of peoples occurs not only materially, but also to a large extent intellectually and ideologically. Look at some of our historians in the 90s, who reshaped the history of our country with Soros money. With money from a man who tried to rebuild this world in his own image and likeness.
Our liberal "scientists" wrote textbooks where there was one small paragraph about the Battle of Stalingrad, and several pages were devoted to the "victory" of the United States in the Second World War.
We can only continue to take the blow, not succumbing to provocations and remember the merits and deeds of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers. We must clearly understand in whose interests this reshaping of history is taking place. After all, when history is being reshaped, it is you and I, it is trying to change us.
Now such a rethinking of history and modernity is taking place in Ukraine. It seems that scavengers attacked her as a victim in order to quickly deal with the barely living country. We can laugh as much as we like at the fact that the Ukrainian anthology says that great ukry dug the Black Sea, but this is a specific strategy that invites the nation to perceive itself as a bearer of the most important directions in the world, the most basic language (as Ukrainian a reader: all other languages originated from the “mighty” Ukrainian language). And this cultivated generation grew up and came to the Maidan with full confidence that it defends its ideals, defends the “great” Ukraine.
All this leads to the fact that the nation ceases to be aware of its essence. She involuntarily follows the ideas that have been instilled in her. And we see the result of this every day.
Local wars
What the earth looks like after a nuclear test, we know well from newsreels, but no one can imagine what consequences we can expect as a result of local military conflicts. After all, chemical enterprises are often under fire. Just one "lucky" hit and an ecological disaster is inevitable. Maybe this is what those who incite local wars are counting on.
Indeed, wars go far from the places where the ruling elite lives. Even the Second World War did not reach the territory of America. It is very convenient to provoke and then observe from a safe distance what is happening in the world. Thanks to America, the entire Middle East is on fire, and the elite is waiting - if it burns out, we will control the resources, and if not, then at least there will be tens of thousands less objectionable. But the Americans forget what can come of it.
At one time, al-Qaeda got out of control and itself thinned the American population by blowing up the New York Twin Towers in 2001. And now ISIS has appeared - an organization banned in Russia, which has become a threat to the Americans themselves.
The outbreak of wars is beneficial to transnational corporations. Thus, they preserve and increase their capital. And also with the help of wars, they destroy unnecessary, disadvantageous peoples.
For about one seventh of humanity living in developed countries, the world has become small. As many as six billion people were found to be superfluous. Any means are used to fight us. We are becoming more and more intelligent animals who care not at all about the history of their country or the fate of their descendants, but only food and simple entertainment. Simply put, they are trying to turn us into a manageable herd that can be easily forced to do whatever is required. The easiest prey in this sense is young people with unclear views.
Today the world is being reshaped for the interests of transnational corporations, but this does not mean that they will win.
The mind cannot understand Russia - this is our main trump card in the fight against Western propaganda. That is why they are unable to thin out our people and make them dance to their tune. Strength is not in money - strength is in truth. And the truth is on the side of those who know how to defend their interests, who do not give in to easy promises, who live by their own minds, who know how to love their homeland and family, and for whom wealth is far from the first place. Russia has every chance to resist prudent plans to reduce the population.