Weather Jumps: Why Is It Time To Stock Up On Food - Alternative View

Table of contents:

Weather Jumps: Why Is It Time To Stock Up On Food - Alternative View
Weather Jumps: Why Is It Time To Stock Up On Food - Alternative View

Video: Weather Jumps: Why Is It Time To Stock Up On Food - Alternative View

Video: Weather Jumps: Why Is It Time To Stock Up On Food - Alternative View
Video: GO STOCK UP ON FOOD RIGHT NOW | NEW LOCKDOWNS AND ECONOMIC CRASH EVENTS ARE COMING 2024, May
Anonim

Market capitalism is doomed: food stamps and socialism await humanity

While social networks and experts are discussing the weather jumps in Moscow and their impact on transport and other problems of the city-metropolis, in fact it is necessary to discuss something else, much more important and truly fundamental. Namely - the inevitable transition from the model of predatory capitalism to a more equitable model of distribution of profits on a global scale and the construction of a society of real, not declared social justice.

While Moscow and Madrid are flooded with showers, in Portugal, Bulgaria, Serbia, Crimea is 45 degrees heat. While the forests are burning in hectares in Portugal, eggs are being fried on sewers in Belgrade. These "gags" of public consciousness are so far overshadowing the real and global consequences of such weather anomalies. However, with a similar course of events in a few years, the emerging problems will rise to their full height.

What is it about. The fact is that such jumps in the weather make agriculture extremely unstable on a planetary scale, and investments in agricultural production are very risky. The situation is such that we cannot predict the weather, much less control it. If the weather pattern of recent years continues, then the problem of collecting a crop sufficient to feed humanity will become very urgent.

An attempt to solve it by capitalism - through raising prices by speculators - has no long-term solution, since sooner or later social tensions and riots of the population will force governments to curb speculators and resort to the socialist practice of regulating prices for basic foodstuffs, and take the food market under strict state control …

And not at the level of national governments, as someone might think, but at the level of a global authorized body, which will be delegated the appropriate powers, including power, and which will be able to redistribute food surpluses from one country or region to others and thus maintain global stability.

It should be noted, by the way, that such a situation, better than others, will be able to prove to all supporters of an egalitarian approach to solving world problems that humanity is really one, and all existing differences in skin color, race, religion, and so on are deeply secondary.

However, such a decision - withdrawing from the market one of the fundamental sectors of the economy for the life of mankind - will inevitably (for a start) affect the energy market, since it is impossible to ensure at least some profitability of the crop in conditions of unregulated fuel prices on a global scale. Accordingly, after taking the agricultural market under price control, I emphasize that on a global scale, and not at the level of individual Russia, Turkey, the United States, China, and the EU, the fuel market will also need to be taken under global control. If you do not fully set the level of prices for generated energy, for gas, oil, coal and so on, in general, for fuel at the global level, then at least limit the rate of profitability by sector, which means the same eggs, only in profile.

Promotional video:

But as soon as the two sectors of the economy that are fundamental for the current technological level of development of human civilization - agricultural and energy - move to planned forms of management and at least directive establishment (limitation) of profitability, their owners or state managers, if a decision is made to nationalize and nationalize these sectors of the economy will require the adoption of similar decisions in relation to other sectors - industry, including high-tech, medicine, sports and so on. And this, undoubtedly, has a positive meaning, since the imbalance of income between 1-5% of the world population and the remaining 95% cannot be called socially just that meets the goals of the development of all mankind as a biological species and is socially fair.

If we talk directly about the reasons for more and more serious natural disasters every year, then we must say frankly and honestly - in fact, no one knows for sure why the weather jumps are becoming more noticeable every year. And all these arguments about "global warming" or about "global cooling" are not worth a damn, since mankind does not have the necessary factual base of temperature regimes in different regions of the world greater than in the last two centuries. And this is simply hundreds of times less than is necessary for at least some approximately accurate assessment of what is happening and building the corresponding versions and ad-hok hypotheses. There is not even the notorious "statistical error" in this question.

It is necessary to understand that all this talk about a global "cooling" or no less global "warming" is in fact nothing more than an attempt to create a mechanism for the removal by one or another world power and media clans of the "climatic" (and in fact, political and status) rent from controlled territories and businesses. Or, to put it in a simple way, - wiring suckers.

Accordingly, in fact, we can only talk about two things. Firstly, either the influence of the anthropogenic factor in the face of a sharply increased human activity to withdraw natural resources and disrupt the natural balances of the "injection" of resources from the thermonuclear core of the earth (oil, gas, gold, non-ferrous metals, coal, ore, etc.), and nature is trying, by blind trial and error, to stop the destruction of this balance and to restore the dynamic balance destroyed by man.

Either, option B, the Earth began to be influenced by such factors that we do not know about (I emphasize - no one knows, not even the "reptilians of the world government"), or which are hiding from us (for example, the notorious Nibiru or the approaching black hole). And they hide it because the disclosure of these facts will immediately reveal the real, genuine, and not artificially, media-constructed agenda of human life ("The Matrix").

Nevertheless, what is interesting and what is very alarming is that regardless of the first and second options (which one is worse is still unknown), both of them do not bode well for humanity. Throughout his history (far from Darwinian), man has shown himself to be an animal, although very intelligent and adaptable, but nevertheless practically uncontrollable, especially when he is in a situation of excess resources. And his behavior under these conditions (excess of food, heat, energy and the possibility of doing nothing) does not differ in any way from the behavior of such highly organized animals as rats - the experiments have already been staged and documented.

With the current psychology of both the overwhelming majority of representatives of the world management elite, and 90% of the entire population of the Earth, we simply cannot be allowed into space in principle - we will destroy all life. This idea is very clearly shown in the fantastic blockbuster "Attraction" by Fyodor Bondarchuk.

If we are the initiators of global natural changes, then we will not stop until nature tramples us back into the Stone Age. If the factors that are unknown to us began to influence nature - they are beyond our control and are independent of us - then we are all the more unable to do anything. In this regard, humanity resembles an overclocked steam locomotive, which is about to break the brakes. It rushes along the rails and passes sharp turns. But with each new turn, they become more and more sharp. The ending of such a movement with virtually no brakes is quite predictable.

Therefore, before it is too late, humanity must stop and think. Think about a lot - about morality, about education, and duplicate industries, communication channels and so on, about income and expenses, and such technologies that could, if not prevent a global natural cataclysm, then allow humanity to survive in it. And, of course, if humanity spent $ 1.5 trillion a year not on weapons, that is, on its destruction, but on development, then we would have at least some chance. In the meantime, we are only killing ourselves as a species. And religion has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Yuri Baranchik