The antique style of many buildings and structures in Russia is often explained by the fascination of Russian tsars and nobles with the era of antiquity, so strange for Christian monarchs and statesmen. But what can then explain such a fascination with the construction of buildings in such a Russian city as Kazan, where the majority of the population was Muslim?
That is why, one of such buildings immediately strikes the eye, depicted in the drawing of the English artist E. Turnerrelli in 1839. It is known about this artist that he was born in London in 1813, and from 1837 to 1844 he lectured on English at Kazan University. It was during this period that an album of his drawings with views of Kazan of that time appeared. And among these pictures my attention was attracted by the one called "Siberian Outpost". But such a characteristic antique appearance of this building in a Muslim city is very unusual.
Who could have built such a thing and when? Surprisingly, even in the book of modern architects E. G. Shcheboleva and V. M. Rudchenko entitled "Architecture of the province" such information is absent. All that you can read there is a description of this amazing ancient structure itself, of which the characteristic antique arch bridge is a part. So they write the following in their book:
Well, if professional architects “did not find the end” about who and when needed to build such an antique structure just across a small stream, then maybe it was not built at all during the time of the Romanovs? And none of this was originally a "outpost" and only then this surviving ancient structure began to be used as a "outpost"?
In general, the Romanovs were inclined towards standardization and even approved "Building Facades" for Russian cities. And here is such an amazing building in the antique style in a single copy and, as is often the case, there is neither a project nor an architect. And it’s not even clear at all: who and when built it. Judging by the drawing by E. Turnerlli, we can only judge its appearance in the 1830s. Why weren't the other outposts at least in Kazan built according to the same project? Logically, this can only be explained by the fact that this ancient structure was built even before the era of the Romanovs and one can only guess about its true purpose.
But if you watch an interesting video from the channel of the researcher A. Romanov called "Knowledge of the Ancients", it becomes clear that both porticoes with columns and obelisks were by no means architectural decorations and delicacies, but elements of a single technical device for generating atmospheric electricity, i.e..e. power plants for obtaining atmospheric electricity. By the way, this same electricity could be used for energy protection. A. Romanov is also quite popular about this. To everyone who is interested in the technical nuances of the operation of such a device, I refer to the interesting video of this electrical engineer, where he explains his work using the example of a similar, but much more powerful structure in the Vatican.
Information about the fate of the "Siberian Outpost" in Kazan is rather scarce on the Internet. I was unable to discover not only when and by whom it was built, but also when and by whom it was destroyed or dismantled. It is only known for certain that here, at the Siberian outpost, ironically in 1741, two once all-powerful favorites met at the court of the Russian Empress Anna Ioannovna - Duke Ernst Biron and Field Marshal Christopher Minich. Having fallen out of favor as a result of palace intrigues and sent to Siberia, Biron was returning from exile - Queen Elizabeth Petrovna, who ascended the throne, allowed him to live in Yaroslavl. But Minikh, who at one time achieved Biron's exile to the distant Siberian village of Pelym, himself went there - to the Pelym exile. And the two courtiers met in Kazan, at the Siberian outpost, near the present Varvara Church.
It turns out that in 1741 this structure not only existed, but was also used as such a "non-standard" outpost. But I think that its true history began before the era of the Romanovs, i.e. back to the ancient civilization, which actually existed not thousands of years ago, but only hundreds. And she died, according to the versions of some researchers of alternative history, during the Flood, which occurred somewhere in the XVI-XVII centuries. Obviously, not all of this building survived, but only two of its porticos with obelisks, which were restored in the era of the Romanovs.
Promotional video:
By the way, this building mysteriously disappeared, again in the second half of the 19th century, after another cataclysm, after which a new "reformatting" of the world by new world "elites" took place. It was during the same period that the obelisks that had previously stood near the colonnades in St. Petersburg and other Russian cities mysteriously disappeared. And I think that it was clearly not without the new "masters of the world", which the technologies of obtaining atmospheric electricity, well known in ancient civilization, and still used in the inter-flood civilization, declared "forbidden" for mankind.
Of course, this is just a hypothesis, but it logically explains why we do not know who and when built this ancient "Siberian outpost" in Kazan, as well as who and when destroyed it. Also, this hypothesis quite logically explains the widespread dismantling of obelisks in St. Petersburg and other Russian cities after the disaster of the mid-19th century, which covered the first floors of buildings all over the world with a strange "clay". And it is quite understandable why even the very fact of this catastrophe is also diligently concealed from us by the hired talkers of the new "masters of the world."
